docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/ticks/tick-5.md
Thread: R12 (RF weather mapping — structural drift from passive ambient WiFi) Verdict: Negative-ish result with a clearly-actionable revision path. Honest progress.
examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_eigenshift.py — pure-NumPy demo that tests "can SVD-eigenvalue drift detect a synthetic structural perturbation?"examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_results.json — full numbers.docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R12-rf-weather-mapping.md — research note covering: 10-year vision, first-experiment method, negative result, why it failed, three concrete revisions for next attempts (PABS / per-subcarrier residuals / multi-day baseline), what still holds, vertical applications.| Cosine distance from baseline | |
|---|---|
| Control (no perturbation) | 0.00035 |
| With 15% attenuation on 3 top-saliency subcarriers | 0.00024 |
| Signal / natural-drift ratio | 0.69× |
The synthetic perturbation produced a smaller spectral distance than natural temporal drift from operator movement. The top-K SVD-spectrum distance approach is too coarse.
This tick wrote NOTHING to PROGRESS.md to avoid races with the horizon-tracker agent (which is on the feat/ruview-mcp-m* track and editing PROGRESS.md concurrently). The ticks/tick-N.md convention used here means each cron-driven tick is fully self-contained — the final 08:00 ET summary script will consolidate them.