Back to Ruflo

Performance SOTA Report — 2026-07-30

docs/dream-cycles/2026-07-30-performance-sota.md

3.34.06.5 KB
Original Source

Performance SOTA Report — 2026-07-30

TL;DR: "Two Calls Beat Five Agents" (arXiv 2607.26922, Grade A) delivers a 7.4× token-efficiency advantage for 2-call self-refinement over 5-agent pipelines in 2026; combined with HalluProp pre-hoc failure inference (84.6% AUROC, 65× speedup over post-hoc), tonight's research shows Ruflo's unconditional swarm invocation policy leaves significant token-efficiency on the table.


What's New in 2026

FindingSourceConfidence
2-call self-refinement achieves 86.2% GSM8K accuracy at 7.4× lower token usage than 5-agent pipeline on Qwen2.5-7BarXiv 2607.26922 (Jul 29, 2026)A
HalluProp pre-hoc failure risk inference: 84.6% AUROC for fault localization, 65× faster than post-hoc, sub-second diagnosisarXiv 2607.26836 (Jul 29, 2026)A
MindForge SLM fine-tuning: Qwen3.6-27B lifted from 37.98% → 49.51% ProgramBench, matching frontier models via synthesis trajectoriesarXiv 2607.27146 (Jul 29, 2026)B
SafeClawArena benchmark: malicious plugins succeed 100% of the time; highest attack success rate 70% across 4 attack surfacesarXiv 2607.30755 (Jun 29, 2026)A
MemSecBench: memory poisoning persists in 84.2% of cases; complete attack chain succeeds in 50.3% across 310 configurationsarXiv 2607.27080 (Jul 29, 2026)A
MTGuard hybrid static-dynamic MCP tool analysis mitigates multiple harmful tool-use categories that static-only inspection missesarXiv 2607.25297 (Jul 28, 2026)A
Classical BFT convergence guarantees do NOT reliably apply to LLM-based Byzantine agentsarXiv 2606.15024 (Jun 12, 2026)A
Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC): decentralized filter-and-refine protocol enables LLM-agent Byzantine resilience without central coordinatorarXiv 2605.09076 (May 9, 2026, rev. Jun 2026)A

Ruflo Current Capability

CapabilityStatusNotes
Multi-agent swarm invocation✅ Active — hierarchical, mesh, adaptive topologiesCLAUDE.md prescribes AUTO-INVOKE for 3+ file tasks
3-tier model routing (ADR-026)✅ Active — deterministic/Haiku/Sonnet by complexityCost-only; no token-efficiency self-refinement path
Pre-hoc failure risk assessment❌ AbsentNo HalluProp-style propagation risk before spawning
Capability-proportionate agent count❌ AbsentCLAUDE.md prescribes maxAgents=8 unconditionally
Memory poisoning detection❌ AbsentAgentDB stores all writes; no MemSecBench-style filtering
MCP runtime tool analysis❌ Absent314 registered tools have no lifecycle-aware dynamic inspection
BFT consensus filtersPartial — byzantine-coordinator existsNot wrapped with resilient consensus filters; classical guarantees don't apply to LLM agents
Token-efficiency benchmark❌ AbsentNo Agents/token-budget metric; performance benchmark suite has no efficiency gate

Competitor Comparison

CompetitorMulti-Agent Efficiency RoutingPre-hoc Risk InferenceMemory Poisoning DefenseMCP Runtime SecurityBFT for LLM Agents
LangGraph v1.2.10❌ None (graph DAG, no efficiency gate)❌ None❌ None❌ None❌ None
AutoGen / MAF v1.0Partial — self-refine mode (Grade B)❌ None❌ NoneDockerExecutor sandbox❌ None
CrewAI v1.15.9❌ None❌ None❌ None❌ None❌ None
OpenAI Agents SDK❌ None❌ None❌ None❌ None❌ None

Ruflo is unregistered on AA-AgentPerf (Artificial Analysis Agents/MW benchmark, Jun 2026) — as are all four competitors above. First-mover opportunity per prior cycle #2778.


Benchmarks

BenchmarkMetricValueSourceGrade
Two Calls vs 5 Agents (GSM8K, Qwen2.5-7B)Token usage ratio7.4× fewer tokens for 2-callarXiv 2607.26922A
Two Calls vs 5 Agents (GSM8K, Qwen2.5-7B)Accuracy86.2% (2-call) vs 86.7% (5-agent)arXiv 2607.26922A
HalluProp pre-hoc fault localizationAUROC84.6% averagearXiv 2607.26836A
HalluProp vs post-hoc baselineSpeed65× faster, sub-secondarXiv 2607.26836A
MemSecBench memory poisoningPersistence rate84.2% (24 configs, 310 cases)arXiv 2607.27080A
MemSecBench complete attack chainSuccess rate50.3%arXiv 2607.27080A
SAC Byzantine resilienceAgreement qualityOutperforms unfiltered LLM agents across topologiesarXiv 2605.09076A
Agentic-SecPBFTAttack detection / throughput95% detection; 3.1× throughput under adversarial conditionsarXiv 2607.03269B

SOTA Proof & Witness

(Filled at Step 4 — see below)

FieldValue
Session commit503b647325f6e0a98bd1d771ae6bca6def331d30
Report SHA-256caa436a48cce5d385c6c2c1693068758e85de92ac6a62a63be4a01f95ac4e783
Witness stamp8369381b2f8f508195bed6f51d6ffad03d037c767bc342bf6eeb379568bdf2ab

Verifier: sha256sum <this-file> → concat with session commit (no separator) → sha256sum → must equal Witness stamp.


  1. Add pre-hoc capability assessment to hooks pre-task (ADR-333 §1): Before routing to swarm, estimate task complexity and hallucination propagation risk using a lightweight classifier (HalluProp pattern). If complexity <30% AND file count ≤2, recommend 2-call self-refinement path instead of spawning agents. Log decision to .swarm/routing-decisions.jsonl. Target: 3–7× token reduction on simple tasks.

  2. Add hooks route efficiency mode (ADR-333 §2): Extend the existing 3-tier model router with a --efficiency-mode flag. In efficiency mode, attempt single-model self-refinement first (2 calls max), then escalate to Haiku (2 agents) or Sonnet multi-agent only if self-refinement score falls below threshold. Gate behind CLAUDE_FLOW_FEATURE_EFFICIENCY_ROUTING=1.

  3. Wire memory store through MemSecBench-informed validator (security scan follow-up): Add provenance-type validation and poisoning detection to AgentDB writes — memory stored without provenance_type field gets flagged for audit worker review. This builds on ADR-322 (provenance typing, #2803) and closes the 50.3% attack-chain success rate identified by MemSecBench.