crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/invalid_syntax.md
Test cases to ensure that ty does not panic if there are syntax errors in the source code.
The parser cannot recover from certain syntax errors completely which is why the number of syntax
errors could be more than expected in the following examples. For instance, if there's a keyword
(like for) in the middle of another statement (like function definition), then it's more likely
that the rest of the tokens are going to be part of the for statement and not the function
definition. But, it's not necessary that the remaining tokens are valid in the context of a for
statement.
When keywords are used as identifiers, the parser recovers from this syntax error by emitting an
error and including the text value of the keyword to create the Identifier node.
# error: [invalid-syntax]
pass = 1
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
type pass = 1
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
def True(for):
# error: [invalid-syntax]
pass
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `pass` used when not defined"
for while in pass:
pass
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `in` used when not defined"
while in:
pass
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `match` used when not defined"
match while:
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `case` used when not defined"
case in:
# error: [invalid-syntax]
pass
# TODO: Check when support for attribute expressions is added
# error: [invalid-syntax]
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `foo` used when not defined"
for x in foo.pass:
pass
Parser recovery can produce a named expression target that is not a name. If that named expression is used as part of a member expression, we should report the syntax error without treating it as a valid place.
obj = 1
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Assignment expression target must be an identifier"
out = (obj.attr := obj).attr
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Assignment expression target must be an identifier"
out = (obj[0] := obj).attr
A capture present in only one invalid or alternative is possibly undefined.
match 0:
case first | second: # error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
first # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
second # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
A capture missing from one alternative is possibly undefined, regardless of alternative order.
match (0,):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
case [first_value] | []:
first_value # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
An alternative without a capture can also occur first.
match (0,):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
case [] | [last_value]:
last_value # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
A capture limited to the middle of three alternatives also remains possibly undefined.
match (0,):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
case [] | [middle_value] | []:
middle_value # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
A prior binding remains visible on alternatives that do not capture the name.
value = "previous"
match (0,):
case [value] | []: # error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
value
value
Shared captures remain definitely bound; branch-specific captures are possibly undefined.
match (0, 1):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
case [first, shared] | [second, shared]:
first # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
second # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
shared
Syntax checking stops after an outer mismatch, but unchecked nested alternatives must still be modeled safely.
match (0,):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
case [first] | [second] | [third | fourth]:
third # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
fourth # error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
A guard can observe a name that is bound by only one invalid alternative.
match (0,):
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
# error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
case [value] | [] if value:
pass
Parser recovery treats the trailing name as an annotation-only statement, whose binding lookup must not panic.
match 0:
# error: [invalid-syntax] "alternative patterns bind different names"
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected `:`, found name"
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected an expression"
case first | second first:
typing.Callablefrom typing import Callable
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected index or slice expression"
# error: [invalid-type-form] "Special form `Callable` expected exactly two arguments (parameter types and return type)"
def _(c: Callable[]):
reveal_type(c) # revealed: (...) -> Unknown
typing.Tuplefrom typing import Tuple
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected index or slice expression"
InvalidEmptyTuple = Tuple[]
def _(t: InvalidEmptyTuple):
reveal_type(t) # revealed: tuple[Unknown]
typing.Unionfrom typing import Union
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected index or slice expression"
InvalidEmptyUnion = Union[]
def _(u: InvalidEmptyUnion):
reveal_type(u) # revealed: Unknown
typing.Unpack[environment]
python-version = "3.11"
An empty Unpack nested inside a union and a generic specialization should report its syntax error
without panicking.
from typing import Union, Unpack
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected index or slice expression"
list[Union[Unpack[], None]]
typing.Annotatedfrom typing import Annotated
# error: [invalid-syntax] "Expected index or slice expression"
# error: [invalid-type-form] "Special form `typing.Annotated` expected at least 2 arguments (one type and at least one metadata element)"
InvalidEmptyAnnotated = Annotated[]
def _(a: InvalidEmptyAnnotated):
reveal_type(a) # revealed: Unknown