Back to Ruff

Descriptor protocol

crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/descriptor_protocol.md

0.16.250.0 KB
Original Source

Descriptor protocol

Descriptors let objects customize attribute lookup, storage, and deletion.

A descriptor is an attribute value that has one of the methods in the descriptor protocol. Those methods are __get__(), __set__(), and __delete__(). If any of those methods are defined for an attribute, it is said to be a descriptor.

Basic properties

Example

An introductory example, modeled after a simple example in the primer on descriptors, involving a descriptor that returns a constant value:

py
from typing import Literal

class Ten:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal[10]:
        return 10

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: Literal[10]) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    ten: Ten = Ten()

c = C()

reveal_type(c.ten)  # revealed: Literal[10]

reveal_type(C.ten)  # revealed: Literal[10]

# This is fine:
c.ten = 10

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `ten` on type `C`"
c.ten = 11

When assigning to the ten attribute from the class object, we get an error. The descriptor protocol is not triggered in this case. Since the attribute is declared as Ten in the class body, we do not allow these assignments, preventing users from accidentally overwriting the data descriptor, which is what would happen at runtime:

py
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[10]` is not assignable to attribute `ten` of type `Ten`"
C.ten = 10
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[11]` is not assignable to attribute `ten` of type `Ten`"
C.ten = 11

Different types for __get__ and __set__

The return type of __get__ and the value type of __set__ can be different:

py
class FlexibleInt:
    def __init__(self):
        self._value: int | None = None

    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int | None:
        return self._value

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int | str) -> None:
        self._value = int(value)

class C:
    flexible_int: FlexibleInt = FlexibleInt()

c = C()

reveal_type(c.flexible_int)  # revealed: int | None

c.flexible_int = 42  # okay
c.flexible_int = "42"  # also okay!

reveal_type(c.flexible_int)  # revealed: int | None

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `flexible_int` on type `C`"
c.flexible_int = None  # not okay

reveal_type(c.flexible_int)  # revealed: int | None

Enum complement as descriptor mutation receiver

overloaded.pyi:

pyi
from enum import Enum
from typing import Literal, overload

class Marker:
    @overload
    def __set__(self, instance: "Literal[Color.GREEN]", value: int) -> None: ...
    @overload
    def __set__(self, instance: "Literal[Color.BLUE]", value: int) -> None: ...
    def __set__(self, instance, value: int) -> None: ...
    @overload
    def __delete__(self, instance: "Literal[Color.GREEN]") -> None: ...
    @overload
    def __delete__(self, instance: "Literal[Color.BLUE]") -> None: ...
    def __delete__(self, instance) -> None: ...

class Color(Enum):
    RED = 1
    GREEN = 2
    BLUE = 3

    marker: Marker
py
from typing import Literal

from overloaded import Color

def narrowed(color: Color):
    if color is Color.RED:
        return
    color.marker = 1
    del color.marker

def explicit(color: Literal[Color.GREEN, Color.BLUE]):
    color.marker = 1
    del color.marker

Data and non-data descriptors

Descriptors that define __set__ or __delete__ are called data descriptors. An example of a data descriptor is a property with a setter and/or a deleter. Descriptors that only define __get__, meanwhile, are called non-data descriptors. Examples include functions, classmethod or staticmethod.

The precedence chain for attribute access is (1) data descriptors, (2) instance attributes, and (3) non-data descriptors.

py
from typing import Literal

class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["data"]:
        return "data"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class NonDataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["non-data"]:
        return "non-data"

class C:
    data_descriptor = DataDescriptor()
    non_data_descriptor = NonDataDescriptor()

    def f(self):
        # This explains why data descriptors come first in the precedence chain. If
        # instance attributes would take priority, we would override the descriptor
        # here. Instead, this calls `DataDescriptor.__set__`, i.e. it does not affect
        # the type of the `data_descriptor` attribute.
        self.data_descriptor = 1

        # However, for non-data descriptors, instance attributes do take precedence.
        # So it is possible to override them.
        # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `non_data_descriptor` of type `NonDataDescriptor`"
        self.non_data_descriptor = 1

c = C()

reveal_type(c.data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

reveal_type(c.non_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"] | int

reveal_type(C.data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

reveal_type(C.non_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"]

# Assignments through class objects are still checked against the declared
# descriptor type.
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["something else"]` is not assignable to attribute `data_descriptor` of type `DataDescriptor`"
C.data_descriptor = "something else"

Partial fall back

Our implementation of the descriptor protocol takes into account that symbols can be possibly unbound. In those cases, we fall back to lower precedence steps of the descriptor protocol and union all possible results accordingly. We start by defining a data and a non-data descriptor:

py
from typing import Literal

class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["data"]:
        return "data"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class NonDataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["non-data"]:
        return "non-data"

Then, we demonstrate that we fall back to an instance attribute if a data descriptor is possibly unbound:

py
def f1(flag: bool):
    class C1:
        if flag:
            attr = DataDescriptor()

        def f(self):
            # error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `attr` on type `Self@f`"
            self.attr = b"foo"

    reveal_type(C1().attr)  # revealed: Literal["data"] | bytes

    # Assigning to the attribute also causes no `possibly-unbound` diagnostic:
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `attr` of type `bytes`"
    C1().attr = 1

We never treat implicit instance attributes as definitely bound, so we fall back to the non-data descriptor here:

py
class C2:
    def f(self):
        # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[b"normal"]` is not assignable to attribute `attr` of type `NonDataDescriptor`"
        self.attr = b"normal"
    attr = NonDataDescriptor()

reveal_type(C2().attr)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"] | bytes

# Reads still fall back to the instance attribute in this case, but assignments
# are checked against the declared class attribute type.
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `attr` of type `NonDataDescriptor`"
C2().attr = 1

Classes with unknown bases are not automatically descriptors

When we cannot determine a class's base, we treat that base as Unknown. A __get__ method written on the class still makes it a descriptor, but we do not assume that Unknown supplies __set__ or __delete__. A __set__ method written on the class still makes it a data descriptor:

py
from typing import Literal
from unknown_module import UnknownBase  # error: [unresolved-import]

class NotADescriptor(UnknownBase): ...

class NonDataDescriptor(UnknownBase):
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["non-data"]:
        return "non-data"

class DataDescriptor(UnknownBase):
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["data"]:
        return "data"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: object) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    plain: NotADescriptor
    non_data: NonDataDescriptor
    data: DataDescriptor

reveal_type(C().plain)  # revealed: NotADescriptor
reveal_type(C().non_data)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"] | NonDataDescriptor
reveal_type(C().data)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

An Any base follows the same rule. A __get__ method written on the class still makes it a descriptor, but we do not assume that Any supplies __set__ or __delete__. A __set__ method written on the class still makes it a data descriptor:

py
from typing import Any, Literal

class NotADescriptor(Any): ...

class NonDataDescriptor(Any):
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["non-data"]:
        return "non-data"

class DataDescriptor(Any):
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["data"]:
        return "data"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: object) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    plain: NotADescriptor
    non_data: NonDataDescriptor
    data: DataDescriptor

reveal_type(C().plain)  # revealed: NotADescriptor
reveal_type(C().non_data)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"] | NonDataDescriptor
reveal_type(C().data)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

class OptionalAttribute:
    value: NotADescriptor | None

optional_attribute = OptionalAttribute()
optional_attribute.value = NotADescriptor()

# The assignment can narrow because `NotADescriptor` has no concrete `__set__` or `__delete__`
# method.
reveal_type(optional_attribute.value)  # revealed: NotADescriptor

An Any base that appears before another base class may override that class's __get__ method at runtime. We still use the later method to determine that the class is a descriptor, but its return type must account for the earlier Any base:

py
class DynamicBase:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["dynamic"]:
        return "dynamic"

class ConcreteBase:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["concrete"]:
        return "concrete"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: object) -> None:
        pass

AnyBase: Any = DynamicBase

class Descriptor(AnyBase, ConcreteBase): ...

class DescriptorOwner:
    attribute: Descriptor = Descriptor()

reveal_type(DescriptorOwner().attribute)  # revealed: Literal["concrete"] & Any

Dynamically typed metaclass attributes

A metaclass attribute typed as Any could itself be a data descriptor. When the attribute is read on a class, it therefore takes precedence over a class attribute with the same name. The same applies when Any is one arm of a union:

py
from typing import Any, Literal

class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["descriptor"]:
        return "descriptor"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: object) -> None:
        pass

class Meta(type):
    attribute: Any = DataDescriptor()

class C(metaclass=Meta):
    attribute: int = 1

reveal_type(C.attribute)  # revealed: Any
C.attribute = "could be accepted by the dynamic descriptor"

class UnionMeta(type):
    attribute: Any | DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()

class UnionC(metaclass=UnionMeta):
    attribute: int = 1

reveal_type(UnionC.attribute)  # revealed: Any | Literal["descriptor"]

Class objects with unknown metaclasses

A type[Any] value could contain a class whose metaclass implements the descriptor protocol. We therefore preserve the possibility that an attribute typed as type[Any] is a data descriptor, both when reading the attribute and after assigning to it:

py
from typing import Any

class DescriptorMeta(type):
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> str:
        return "descriptor"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: object) -> None:
        pass

class Descriptor(metaclass=DescriptorMeta): ...

class C:
    attribute: type[Any] = Descriptor

c = C()
reveal_type(c.attribute)  # revealed: Any

c.attribute = int
reveal_type(c.attribute)  # revealed: Any

Descriptors only work when used as class variables

Descriptors only work when used as class variables. When put in instances, they have no effect.

py
from typing import Literal

class Ten:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal[10]:
        return 10

class C:
    def __init__(self):
        self.ten: Ten = Ten()

reveal_type(C().ten)  # revealed: Ten

C().ten = Ten()

# The instance attribute is declared as `Ten`, so this is an
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[10]` is not assignable to attribute `ten` of type `Ten`"
C().ten = 10

Descriptor protocol for class objects

When attributes are accessed on a class object, the following precedence chain is used:

  • Data descriptor on the metaclass
  • Data or non-data descriptor on the class
  • Class attribute
  • Non-data descriptor on the metaclass
  • Metaclass attribute

To verify this, we define a data and a non-data descriptor:

py
from typing import Literal, Any

class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["data"]:
        return "data"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class NonDataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["non-data"]:
        return "non-data"

First, we make sure that the descriptors are correctly accessed when defined on the metaclass or the class:

py
class Meta1(type):
    meta_data_descriptor: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
    meta_non_data_descriptor: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()

class C1(metaclass=Meta1):
    class_data_descriptor: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
    class_non_data_descriptor: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()

reveal_type(C1.meta_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["data"]
reveal_type(C1.meta_non_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"]

reveal_type(C1.class_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["data"]
reveal_type(C1.class_non_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"]

Assignments to class object attribute only trigger the descriptor protocol if the data descriptor is on the metaclass:

py
C1.meta_data_descriptor = 1

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `meta_data_descriptor` on type `<class 'C1'>`"
C1.meta_data_descriptor = "invalid"

When writing to a class-level data descriptor from the class object itself, the descriptor protocol is not triggered (this is in contrast to what happens when you read class-level descriptor attributes!). So the following assignment does not call __set__. At runtime, the assignment would overwrite the data descriptor, but the attribute is declared as DataDescriptor in the class body, so we do not allow this:

py
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `class_data_descriptor` of type `DataDescriptor`"
C1.class_data_descriptor = 1

We now demonstrate that a metaclass data descriptor takes precedence over all class-level attributes:

py
class Meta2(type):
    meta_data_descriptor1: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
    meta_data_descriptor2: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()

class ClassLevelDataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> Literal["class level data descriptor"]:
        return "class level data descriptor"

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: str) -> None:
        pass

class C2(metaclass=Meta2):
    meta_data_descriptor1: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
    meta_data_descriptor2: ClassLevelDataDescriptor = ClassLevelDataDescriptor()

reveal_type(C2.meta_data_descriptor1)  # revealed: Literal["data"]
reveal_type(C2.meta_data_descriptor2)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

C2.meta_data_descriptor1 = 1
C2.meta_data_descriptor2 = 1

# error: [invalid-assignment]
C2.meta_data_descriptor1 = "invalid"
# error: [invalid-assignment]
C2.meta_data_descriptor2 = "invalid"

On the other hand, normal metaclass attributes and metaclass non-data descriptors are shadowed by class-level attributes (descriptor or not):

py
class Meta3(type):
    meta_attribute1: Literal["value on metaclass"] = "value on metaclass"
    meta_attribute2: Literal["value on metaclass"] = "value on metaclass"
    meta_non_data_descriptor1: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()
    meta_non_data_descriptor2: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()

class C3(metaclass=Meta3):
    meta_attribute1: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
    meta_attribute2: ClassLevelDataDescriptor = ClassLevelDataDescriptor()
    meta_non_data_descriptor1: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
    meta_non_data_descriptor2: ClassLevelDataDescriptor = ClassLevelDataDescriptor()

reveal_type(C3.meta_attribute1)  # revealed: Literal["value on class"]
reveal_type(C3.meta_attribute2)  # revealed: Literal["class level data descriptor"]
reveal_type(C3.meta_non_data_descriptor1)  # revealed: Literal["value on class"]
reveal_type(C3.meta_non_data_descriptor2)  # revealed: Literal["class level data descriptor"]

C3.meta_non_data_descriptor1 = "value on class"
# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["invalid"]` is not assignable to attribute `meta_non_data_descriptor1` of type `Literal["value on class"]`"
C3.meta_non_data_descriptor1 = "invalid"

Finally, metaclass attributes and metaclass non-data descriptors are only accessible when they are not shadowed by class-level attributes:

py
class Meta4(type):
    meta_attribute: Literal["value on metaclass"] = "value on metaclass"
    meta_non_data_descriptor: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()

class C4(metaclass=Meta4): ...

reveal_type(C4.meta_attribute)  # revealed: Literal["value on metaclass"]
reveal_type(C4.meta_non_data_descriptor)  # revealed: Literal["non-data"]

When a metaclass data descriptor is possibly missing, we union the result type of its __get__ method with an underlying class level attribute, if present:

py
def _(flag: bool):
    class Meta5(type):
        if flag:
            meta_data_descriptor1: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
            meta_data_descriptor2: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()

    class C5(metaclass=Meta5):
        meta_data_descriptor1: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"

    reveal_type(C5.meta_data_descriptor1)  # revealed: Literal["data", "value on class"]
    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute]
    reveal_type(C5.meta_data_descriptor2)  # revealed: Literal["data"]

    # TODO: We currently emit two diagnostics here, corresponding to the two states of `flag`. The diagnostics are not
    # wrong, but they could be subsumed under a higher-level diagnostic.

    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `meta_data_descriptor1` on type `<class 'C5'>`"
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `None` is not assignable to attribute `meta_data_descriptor1` of type `Literal["value on class"]`"
    C5.meta_data_descriptor1 = None

    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute]
    C5.meta_data_descriptor2 = 1

When a class-level attribute is possibly missing, we union its (descriptor protocol) type with the metaclass attribute (unless it's a data descriptor, which always takes precedence):

py
from typing import Any

def _(flag: bool):
    class Meta6(type):
        attribute1: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
        attribute2: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()
        attribute3: Literal["value on metaclass"] = "value on metaclass"

    class C6(metaclass=Meta6):
        if flag:
            attribute1: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
            attribute2: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
            attribute3: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"
            attribute4: Literal["value on class"] = "value on class"

    reveal_type(C6.attribute1)  # revealed: Literal["data"]
    reveal_type(C6.attribute2)  # revealed: Literal["non-data", "value on class"]
    reveal_type(C6.attribute3)  # revealed: Literal["value on metaclass", "value on class"]
    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute]
    reveal_type(C6.attribute4)  # revealed: Literal["value on class"]

Finally, we can also have unions of various types of attributes:

py
def _(flag: bool):
    class Meta7(type):
        if flag:
            union_of_metaclass_attributes: Literal[1] = 1
            union_of_metaclass_data_descriptor_and_attribute: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
        else:
            union_of_metaclass_attributes: Literal[2] = 2
            union_of_metaclass_data_descriptor_and_attribute: Literal[2] = 2

    class C7(metaclass=Meta7):
        if flag:
            union_of_class_attributes: Literal[1] = 1
            union_of_class_data_descriptor_and_attribute: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()
        else:
            union_of_class_attributes: Literal[2] = 2
            union_of_class_data_descriptor_and_attribute: Literal[2] = 2

    reveal_type(C7.union_of_metaclass_attributes)  # revealed: Literal[1, 2]
    reveal_type(C7.union_of_metaclass_data_descriptor_and_attribute)  # revealed: Literal["data", 2]
    reveal_type(C7.union_of_class_attributes)  # revealed: Literal[1, 2]
    reveal_type(C7.union_of_class_data_descriptor_and_attribute)  # revealed: Literal["data", 2]

    C7.union_of_metaclass_attributes = 2 if flag else 1
    # TODO: https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1163
    # error: [invalid-assignment]
    C7.union_of_metaclass_data_descriptor_and_attribute = 2 if flag else 100
    C7.union_of_class_attributes = 2 if flag else 1
    C7.union_of_class_data_descriptor_and_attribute = 2 if flag else DataDescriptor()

Descriptors distinguishing between class and instance access

Overloads can be used to distinguish between when a descriptor is accessed on a class object and when it is accessed on an instance. A real-world example of this is the __get__ method on types.FunctionType.

py
from typing_extensions import Literal, LiteralString, overload

class Descriptor:
    @overload
    def __get__(self, instance: None, owner: type, /) -> Literal["called on class object"]: ...
    @overload
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None, /) -> Literal["called on instance"]: ...
    def __get__(self, instance, owner=None, /) -> LiteralString:
        if instance:
            return "called on instance"
        else:
            return "called on class object"

class C:
    d: Descriptor = Descriptor()

reveal_type(C.d)  # revealed: Literal["called on class object"]

reveal_type(C().d)  # revealed: Literal["called on instance"]

Descriptor protocol for dunder methods

Dunder methods are always looked up on the meta-type. There is no instance fallback. This means that an implicit dunder call on an instance-like object will not only look up the dunder method on the class object, without considering instance attributes. And an implicit dunder call on a class object will look up the dunder method on the metaclass, without considering class attributes.

py
class SomeCallable:
    def __call__(self, x: int) -> str:
        return "a"

class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> SomeCallable:
        return SomeCallable()

class B:
    __call__: Descriptor = Descriptor()

b_instance = B()
reveal_type(b_instance(1))  # revealed: str

b_instance("bla")  # error: [invalid-argument-type]

Special descriptors

Built-in property descriptor

The built-in property decorator creates a descriptor. The names for attribute reads/writes are determined by the return type of the name method and the parameter type of the setter, respectively.

py
class C:
    _name: str | None = None

    @property
    def name(self) -> str:
        return self._name or "Unset"

    @name.setter
    def name(self, value: str | None) -> None:
        self._value = value

c = C()

reveal_type(c._name)  # revealed: str | None
reveal_type(c.name)  # revealed: str
reveal_type(C.name)  # revealed: property

c.name = "new"
c.name = None

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `name` on type `C`"
c.name = 42

Overriding properties in subclasses

When a subclass overrides a property, accessing other inherited properties from within the overriding property methods should still work correctly.

py
class Base:
    _value: float = 0.0

    @property
    def value(self) -> float:
        return self._value

    @value.setter
    def value(self, v: float) -> None:
        self._value = v

    @property
    def other(self) -> float:
        return self.value

    @other.setter
    def other(self, v: float) -> None:
        self.value = v

class Derived(Base):
    @property
    def other(self) -> float:
        return self.value

    @other.setter
    def other(self, v: float) -> None:
        reveal_type(self.value)  # revealed: float
        self.value = v

Properties with no setters

If a property has no setter, we emit a bespoke error message when a user attempts to set that attribute, since this is a common error.

py
class DontAssignToMe:
    @property
    def immutable(self): ...

# snapshot: invalid-assignment
DontAssignToMe().immutable = "the properties, they are a-changing"
snapshot
error[invalid-assignment]: Cannot assign to read-only property `immutable` on object of type `DontAssignToMe`
 --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:6:1
  |
3 |     def immutable(self): ...
  |         --------- Property `DontAssignToMe.immutable` defined here with no setter
4 |
5 | # snapshot: invalid-assignment
6 | DontAssignToMe().immutable = "the properties, they are a-changing"
  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Attempted assignment to `DontAssignToMe.immutable` here

Built-in classmethod descriptor

Similarly to property, classmethod decorator creates an implicit descriptor that binds the first argument to the class instead of the instance.

py
class C:
    def __init__(self, value: str) -> None:
        self._name: str = value

    @classmethod
    def factory(cls, value: str) -> "C":
        return cls(value)

    @classmethod
    def get_name(cls) -> str:
        return cls.__name__

c1 = C.factory("test")  # okay

reveal_type(c1)  # revealed: C

reveal_type(C.get_name())  # revealed: str

reveal_type(C("42").get_name())  # revealed: str

Built-in staticmethod descriptor

py
class C:
    @staticmethod
    def helper(value: str) -> str:
        return value

reveal_type(C.helper("42"))  # revealed: str
c = C()
reveal_type(c.helper("string"))  # revealed: str

Functions as descriptors

Functions are descriptors because they implement a __get__ method. This is crucial in making sure that method calls work as expected. See this test suite for more information. Here, we only demonstrate how __get__ works on functions:

py
import types
from inspect import getattr_static
from ty_extensions import static_assert
from ty_extensions._internal import TypeOf, is_subtype_of

def f(x: object) -> str:
    return "a"

reveal_type(f)  # revealed: def f(x: object) -> str
reveal_type(f.__get__)  # revealed: <method-wrapper '__get__' of function 'f'>
static_assert(is_subtype_of(TypeOf[f.__get__], types.MethodWrapperType))
reveal_type(f.__get__(None, type(f)))  # revealed: def f(x: object) -> str
reveal_type(f.__get__(None, type(f))(1))  # revealed: str

wrapper_descriptor = getattr_static(f, "__get__")

reveal_type(wrapper_descriptor)  # revealed: <wrapper-descriptor '__get__' of 'function' objects>
reveal_type(wrapper_descriptor(f, None, type(f)))  # revealed: def f(x: object) -> str
static_assert(is_subtype_of(TypeOf[wrapper_descriptor], types.WrapperDescriptorType))

# Attribute access on the method-wrapper `f.__get__` falls back to `MethodWrapperType`:
reveal_type(f.__get__.__hash__)  # revealed: bound method MethodWrapperType.__hash__() -> int

# Attribute access on the wrapper-descriptor falls back to `WrapperDescriptorType`:
reveal_type(wrapper_descriptor.__qualname__)  # revealed: str

We can also bind the free function f to an instance of a class C:

py
class C: ...

bound_method = wrapper_descriptor(f, C(), C)

reveal_type(bound_method)  # revealed: bound method C.f() -> str

We can then call it, and the instance of C is implicitly passed to the first parameter of f (x):

py
reveal_type(bound_method())  # revealed: str

Finally, we test some error cases for the call to the wrapper descriptor:

py
# Calling the wrapper descriptor without any arguments is an
# error: [no-matching-overload] "No overload of wrapper descriptor `FunctionType.__get__` matches arguments"
wrapper_descriptor()

# Calling it without the `instance` argument is an also an
# error: [no-matching-overload] "No overload of wrapper descriptor `FunctionType.__get__` matches arguments"
wrapper_descriptor(f)

# TODO: Calling it without the `owner` argument if `instance` is not `None` fails at runtime.
# Ideally we would emit a diagnostic here,
# but this is hard to model without introducing false positives elsewhere
wrapper_descriptor(f, None)

# But calling it with an instance is fine (in this case, the `owner` argument is optional):
wrapper_descriptor(f, C())

# Calling it with something that is not a `FunctionType` as the first argument is an
# error: [no-matching-overload] "No overload of wrapper descriptor `FunctionType.__get__` matches arguments"
wrapper_descriptor(1, None, type(f))

# Calling it with something that is not a `type` as the `owner` argument is an
# error: [no-matching-overload] "No overload of wrapper descriptor `FunctionType.__get__` matches arguments"
wrapper_descriptor(f, None, f)

# Calling it with too many positional arguments is an
# error: [no-matching-overload] "No overload of wrapper descriptor `FunctionType.__get__` matches arguments"
wrapper_descriptor(f, None, type(f), "one too many")

Error handling and edge cases

__get__ is called with correct arguments

Python passes the instance and its class to a descriptor on an instance access. On a class access, it passes None and the class instead. A descriptor on a metaclass receives the class and its metaclass.

py
from __future__ import annotations

class TailoredForClassObjectAccess:
    def __get__(self, instance: None, owner: type[C]) -> int:
        return 1

class TailoredForInstanceAccess:
    def __get__(self, instance: C, owner: type[C] | None = None) -> str:
        return "a"

class TailoredForMetaclassAccess:
    def __get__(self, instance: type[C], owner: type[Meta]) -> bytes:
        return b"a"

class Meta(type):
    metaclass_access: TailoredForMetaclassAccess = TailoredForMetaclassAccess()

class C(metaclass=Meta):
    class_object_access: TailoredForClassObjectAccess = TailoredForClassObjectAccess()
    instance_access: TailoredForInstanceAccess = TailoredForInstanceAccess()

reveal_type(C.class_object_access)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(C().instance_access)  # revealed: str
reveal_type(C.metaclass_access)  # revealed: bytes

An invalid descriptor access is reported, but we still use the declared return type of __get__ to avoid cascading errors.

py
# snapshot: invalid-attribute-access
reveal_type(C().class_object_access)  # revealed: int

# snapshot: invalid-attribute-access
reveal_type(C.instance_access)  # revealed: str
snapshot
error[invalid-attribute-access]: Invalid access to descriptor attribute `class_object_access` on type `C`
  --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:26:13
   |
26 | reveal_type(C().class_object_access)  # revealed: int
   |             ^^^ Expected `None`, found `C`
info: Argument to function `TailoredForClassObjectAccess.__get__` is incorrect
info: This access implicitly calls `__get__` on a descriptor of type `TailoredForClassObjectAccess`
info: Function defined here
 --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:4:9
  |
4 |     def __get__(self, instance: None, owner: type[C]) -> int:
  |         ^^^^^^^       -------------- Parameter declared here


error[invalid-attribute-access]: Invalid access to descriptor attribute `instance_access` on type `<class 'C'>`
  --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:29:13
   |
29 | reveal_type(C.instance_access)  # revealed: str
   |             ^ Expected `C`, found `None`
info: Argument to function `TailoredForInstanceAccess.__get__` is incorrect
info: This access implicitly calls `__get__` on a descriptor of type `TailoredForInstanceAccess`
info: Function defined here
 --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:8:9
  |
8 |     def __get__(self, instance: C, owner: type[C] | None = None) -> str:
  |         ^^^^^^^       ----------- Parameter declared here

Descriptors with an incorrect __get__ signature

Python calls __get__ with the descriptor, an instance or None, and the owner class. A method that accepts only the descriptor cannot handle that call.

py
class Descriptor:
    # `__get__` method with missing parameters:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class C:
    descriptor: Descriptor = Descriptor()

C().descriptor  # snapshot: invalid-attribute-access

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `descriptor` on type `<class 'C'>`"
reveal_type(C.descriptor)  # revealed: int
snapshot
error[invalid-attribute-access]: Invalid access to descriptor attribute `descriptor` on type `C`
 --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:9:1
  |
9 | C().descriptor  # snapshot: invalid-attribute-access
  | ^^^ Too many positional arguments to function `Descriptor.__get__`: expected 1, got 3
info: This access implicitly calls `__get__` on a descriptor of type `Descriptor`
info: Function signature here
 --> src/mdtest_snippet.py:3:9
  |
3 |     def __get__(self) -> int:
  |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Recursive descriptor aliases terminate

Inspecting a recursive attribute must not recurse forever. The recursive alternative also cannot prove that the access will invoke an invalid descriptor.

toml
[environment]
python-version = "3.12"
py
type Recursive = int | Recursive

class C:
    value: Recursive = 1

C().value

Property getters reject invalid receiver specializations

A property getter checks the same specialized receiver as an ordinary method. A generic alias with alternatives that impose different type-variable bounds can produce an invalid property access.

py
from collections.abc import Callable
from typing import Generic, TypeVar

AItem = TypeVar("AItem", bound=Callable[[int], str])
BItem = TypeVar("BItem", bound=Callable[[str], str])

class A(Generic[AItem]):
    @property
    def callback(self) -> AItem:
        raise NotImplementedError

class B(Generic[BItem]):
    @property
    def callback(self) -> BItem:
        raise NotImplementedError

AnyCallback = TypeVar("AnyCallback", bound=Callable[..., str])
Command = A[AnyCallback] | B[AnyCallback]
Callback = TypeVar("Callback", bound=Callable[[int], str])

def access(value: Callback | Command[Callback]) -> None:
    if isinstance(value, A | B):
        # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
        value.callback

Property getter failures preserve their underlying error and return type

A property inherited from an unrelated class rejects the instance passed to its getter. The diagnostic reports the getter's actual receiver mismatch and preserves its return type.

py
class Owner:
    @property
    def value(self) -> int:
        return 1

class Other:
    value = Owner.value

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Expected `Owner`, found `Other`"
reveal_type(Other().value)  # revealed: int

Every descriptor alternative must accept the call

As with other operations on a union, an attribute access is invalid if any possible descriptor cannot accept the implicit call.

py
class BrokenDescriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> bytes:
        return b""

class ValidDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> str:
        return ""

def descriptor() -> BrokenDescriptor | ValidDescriptor:
    raise NotImplementedError

class C:
    value = descriptor()

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `C`"
reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: bytes | str

Descriptor diagnostics are reported through super()

Accessing an inherited descriptor through super() still invokes its __get__ method.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class Base:
    value = Descriptor()

class Derived(Base):
    def access(self) -> None:
        # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
        super().value

Type variables preserve invalid descriptor calls

A type variable's bound does not prevent its receiver or descriptor value from reaching an invalid __get__ method. The same applies when accessing an attribute on type[T].

py
from typing import TypeVar

class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class Owner:
    value = Descriptor()

OwnerT = TypeVar("OwnerT", bound=Owner)
DescriptorT = TypeVar("DescriptorT", bound=Descriptor)

def instance(owner: OwnerT) -> None:
    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    owner.value

def class_object(owner: type[OwnerT]) -> None:
    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    owner.value

def descriptor_value(descriptor: DescriptorT) -> None:
    class C:
        value = descriptor

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    C().value

Intersections preserve invalid descriptor calls

Intersecting a receiver or descriptor value with another type does not make its invalid __get__ method callable.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class Owner:
    value = Descriptor()

class Marker: ...

def receiver(owner: Owner) -> None:
    if isinstance(owner, Marker):
        # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
        owner.value

def descriptor_value(descriptor: Descriptor) -> None:
    if isinstance(descriptor, Marker):
        class C:
            value = descriptor

        # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
        C().value

Every __get__ definition must accept the call

A conditionally defined method can have several callable signatures. The access is invalid if any possible definition rejects the call.

py
def access(flag: bool) -> None:
    class Descriptor:
        if flag:
            def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
                return 1

        else:
            def __get__(self) -> str:
                return ""

    class C:
        value = Descriptor()

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `C`"
    reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: int | str

A possible __getattr__ fallback does not hide an invalid descriptor

When a descriptor is only conditionally present, __getattr__ handles the path where it is absent. The other path still invokes the invalid descriptor and must produce a diagnostic.

py
def access(flag: bool) -> None:
    class Descriptor:
        def __get__(self) -> int:
            return 1

    class C:
        if flag:
            value = Descriptor()

        def __getattr__(self, name: str) -> str:
            return name

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: int | str

A class-object lookup uses its declared member type

Class-object member lookup uses the declared attribute type even when the declaration has no value.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class C:
    value: Descriptor

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `<class 'C'>`"
C.value

An instance __getattribute__ can bypass descriptors

A custom __getattribute__ can return without invoking the malformed descriptor. The ordinary member type remains unchanged, even when the override has the same return type as the descriptor.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

    def __getattribute__(self, name: str) -> int:
        return 42

reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: int

An instance __getattribute__ may delegate to descriptor lookup

The return annotation of an override does not establish whether it delegates to the default attribute lookup. Since ty does not inspect the implementation, it cannot conclude that the descriptor is invoked.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

    def __getattribute__(self, name: str) -> str:
        return super().__getattribute__(name)

C().value

An assigned instance attribute shadows a non-data descriptor

An instance attribute takes precedence over a non-data descriptor. After the assignment, reading the attribute does not call the descriptor.

py
from typing import Literal

class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

    def replace(self) -> None:
        self.value: int = 1
        reveal_type(self.value)  # revealed: Literal[1]

An instance assignment does not shadow a data descriptor

Assigning to a data descriptor invokes its __set__ method. A subsequent read still invokes its __get__ method, even though the attribute has a known assigned type.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

    def access(self) -> None:
        self.value = 1
        # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
        self.value

A conditional assignment does not hide an invalid descriptor call

The assignment shadows the non-data descriptor on one path, but the other path still invokes its invalid __get__ method.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

def access(c: C, flag: bool) -> None:
    if flag:
        c.value = Descriptor()

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `C`"
    c.value

Augmented assignment reads before writing

An augmented assignment reads the descriptor before writing the operation's result. The malformed __get__ call is therefore reported even though __set__ accepts the result.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

c = C()
# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `C`"
c.value += 1

Deletion does not read a descriptor

Deleting a descriptor calls __delete__ without first calling __get__.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> int:
        return 1

    def __delete__(self, instance: object) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    value = Descriptor()

c = C()
del c.value

A class attribute can shadow a metaclass non-data descriptor

The class attribute takes precedence, so the malformed metaclass descriptor is not invoked.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

class Meta(type):
    value = Descriptor()

class C(metaclass=Meta):
    value = 1

reveal_type(C.value)  # revealed: int

A possible class attribute does not shadow a metaclass descriptor

A conditionally defined class attribute shadows a metaclass descriptor only when it exists. The other path invokes the invalid descriptor.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

class Meta(type):
    value = Descriptor()

def access(flag: bool) -> None:
    class C(metaclass=Meta):
        if flag:
            value = 1

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    reveal_type(C.value)  # revealed: str | int

A metaclass data descriptor takes precedence over a class attribute

A data descriptor on the metaclass runs even when the class defines an attribute with the same name, so an invalid descriptor call must be reported.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class Meta(type):
    value = Descriptor()

class C(metaclass=Meta):
    value = 1

# error: [invalid-attribute-access]
reveal_type(C.value)  # revealed: str

A metaclass data descriptor shadows an invalid class descriptor

A data descriptor on the metaclass has priority over a descriptor stored on the class. The class descriptor is never called, so its invalid signature does not affect the access.

py
class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
        return 1

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class InvalidDescriptor:
    def __get__(self) -> str:
        return ""

class Meta(type):
    value = DataDescriptor()

class C(metaclass=Meta):
    value = InvalidDescriptor()

reveal_type(C.value)  # revealed: int

__get__ is not callable

Python still attempts to call a non-callable __get__ attribute, so the access fails and its type is unknown.

py
class Descriptor:
    __get__: None = None

class C:
    value: Descriptor = Descriptor()

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Invalid access to descriptor attribute `value` on type `C`"
reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: Unknown

Undeclared descriptor arguments

If a descriptor attribute is not declared, we union with Unknown, just like for regular attributes, since that attribute could be overwritten externally. Even a data descriptor with a __set__ method can be overwritten when accessed through a class object.

py
class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
        return 1

    def __set__(self, instance: object, value: int) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    descriptor = Descriptor()

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["something else"]` is not assignable to attribute `descriptor` of type `Descriptor`"
C.descriptor = "something else"
reveal_type(C.descriptor)  # revealed: int

Possibly unbound descriptor attributes

py
class DataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
        return 1

    def __set__(self, instance: int, value) -> None:
        pass

class NonDataDescriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
        return 1

def _(flag: bool):
    class PossiblyUnbound:
        if flag:
            non_data: NonDataDescriptor = NonDataDescriptor()
            data: DataDescriptor = DataDescriptor()

    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `non_data` may be missing on class `PossiblyUnbound`"
    reveal_type(PossiblyUnbound.non_data)  # revealed: int

    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `non_data` may be missing on object of type `PossiblyUnbound`"
    reveal_type(PossiblyUnbound().non_data)  # revealed: int

    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `data` may be missing on class `PossiblyUnbound`"
    reveal_type(PossiblyUnbound.data)  # revealed: int

    # error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `data` may be missing on object of type `PossiblyUnbound`"
    reveal_type(PossiblyUnbound().data)  # revealed: int

Possibly-unbound __get__ method

py
def _(flag: bool):
    class MaybeDescriptor:
        if flag:
            def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) -> int:
                return 1

    class C:
        descriptor: MaybeDescriptor = MaybeDescriptor()

    reveal_type(C.descriptor)  # revealed: int | MaybeDescriptor

    reveal_type(C().descriptor)  # revealed: int | MaybeDescriptor

A possibly-unbound invalid __get__ method still fails when present

When a descriptor method is only conditionally defined, the branch where it exists must still accept the implicit descriptor arguments.

py
def access(flag: bool) -> None:
    class Descriptor:
        if flag:
            def __get__(self) -> int:
                return 1

    class C:
        value = Descriptor()

    # error: [invalid-attribute-access]
    reveal_type(C().value)  # revealed: int | Descriptor

Descriptors with non-function __get__ callables that are descriptors themselves

The descriptor protocol is recursive, i.e. looking up __get__ can involve triggering the descriptor protocol on the callable's __call__ method:

py
from __future__ import annotations

class ReturnedCallable2:
    def __call__(self, descriptor: Descriptor1, instance: None, owner: type[C]) -> int:
        return 1

class ReturnedCallable1:
    def __call__(self, descriptor: Descriptor2, instance: Callable1, owner: type[Callable1]) -> ReturnedCallable2:
        return ReturnedCallable2()

class Callable3:
    def __call__(self, descriptor: Descriptor3, instance: Callable2, owner: type[Callable2]) -> ReturnedCallable1:
        return ReturnedCallable1()

class Descriptor3:
    __get__: Callable3 = Callable3()

class Callable2:
    __call__: Descriptor3 = Descriptor3()

class Descriptor2:
    __get__: Callable2 = Callable2()

class Callable1:
    __call__: Descriptor2 = Descriptor2()

class Descriptor1:
    __get__: Callable1 = Callable1()

class C:
    d: Descriptor1 = Descriptor1()

reveal_type(C.d)  # revealed: int

Descriptors with Concatenate self-types on __get__

This is a regression test for https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/3289.

py
from typing import Any, Callable, Concatenate, Generic, ParamSpec, TypeVar

P = ParamSpec("P")
P2 = ParamSpec("P2")
T = TypeVar("T")

class FunctionWrapper(Generic[P]):
    def __get__(
        self: "FunctionWrapper[Concatenate[T, P2]]",
        instance: T,
    ) -> None:
        raise NotImplementedError

def wrapper(fn: Callable[P, Any]) -> FunctionWrapper[P]:
    raise NotImplementedError

class Example:
    @wrapper
    def __call__(self) -> None:
        pass