content/develop/clients/lettuce/vecsearch.md
[Redis Search]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query" >}}) lets you index vector fields in [hash]({{< relref "/develop/data-types/hashes" >}}) or [JSON]({{< relref "/develop/data-types/json" >}}) objects (see the [Vectors]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/vectors" >}}) reference page for more information). Among other things, vector fields can store text embeddings, which are AI-generated vector representations of the semantic information in pieces of text. The [vector distance]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/vectors#distance-metrics" >}}) between two embeddings indicates how similar they are semantically. By comparing the similarity of an embedding generated from some query text with embeddings stored in hash or JSON fields, Redis can retrieve documents that closely match the query in terms of their meaning.
The example below uses the HuggingFace model
all-MiniLM-L6-v2
to generate the vector embeddings to store and index with Redis Search.
The code is first demonstrated for hash documents with a
separate section to explain the
differences with JSON documents.
If you are using Maven, add the following
dependencies to your pom.xml file:
<dependency>
<groupId>io.lettuce</groupId>
<artifactId>lettuce-core</artifactId>
<!-- Check for the latest version on Maven Central -->
<version>6.7.1.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>ai.djl.huggingface</groupId>
<artifactId>tokenizers</artifactId>
<version>0.33.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>ai.djl.pytorch</groupId>
<artifactId>pytorch-model-zoo</artifactId>
<version>0.33.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>ai.djl</groupId>
<artifactId>api</artifactId>
<version>0.33.0</version>
</dependency>
If you are using Gradle, add the following
dependencies to your build.gradle file:
compileOnly 'io.lettuce:lettuce-core:6.7.1.RELEASE'
compileOnly 'ai.djl.huggingface:tokenizers:0.33.0'
compileOnly 'ai.djl.pytorch:pytorch-model-zoo:0.33.0'
compileOnly 'ai.djl:api:0.33.0'
Import the following classes in your source file:
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="import" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Import Lettuce, DJL, and embedding model libraries for vector search" difficulty="beginner" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
When you store vectors in a hash object, or pass them as query parameters,
you must encode the float components of the vector
array as a byte string. The helper method floatArrayToByteBuffer()
shown below does this for you:
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="helper_method" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Convert float arrays to ByteBuffer format for storing vectors in hash objects" difficulty="beginner" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
The example below uses the
all-MiniLM-L6-v2
model to generate the embeddings. This model generates vectors with 384 dimensions, regardless of the length of the input text, but note that the input is truncated to 256
tokens (see
Word piece tokenization
at the Hugging Face docs to learn more about the way tokens
are related to the original text).
The Predictor
class implements the model to generate the embeddings. The code below
creates an instance of Predictor that uses the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model:
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="model" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Practical pattern: Initialize a DJL Predictor with the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embedding model" difficulty="beginner" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
As noted in Define a helper method above, you must pass the embeddings to the hash and query commands as a binary string.
Lettuce has an option to specify a ByteBufferCodec for the connection to Redis.
This lets you construct binary strings for Redis keys and values conveniently using
the standard
ByteBuffer
class (see Codecs
in the Lettuce documentation for more information). However, you will probably find
it more convenient to use the default StringCodec for commands that don't require binary strings. It is therefore helpful to have two connections available, one using ByteBufferCodec and one using StringCodec.
The code below shows how to declare one connection with the
ByteBufferCodec and another without in the try-with-resources
block. You also need two separate instances of RedisAsyncCommands to
use the two connections:
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="connect" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Practical pattern: Create dual connections with ByteBufferCodec and StringCodec for vector operations" difficulty="intermediate" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
Next, create the index. The schema in the example below includes three fields:
The embedding field specifies
[HNSW]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/vectors#hnsw-index" >}})
indexing, the
[L2]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/vectors#distance-metrics" >}})
vector distance metric, Float32 values to represent the vector's components,
and 384 dimensions, as required by the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embedding model.
The CreateArgs object specifies hash objects for storage and a
prefix doc: that identifies the hash objects to index.
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="create_index" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Create a vector search index with HNSW algorithm, L2 distance metric, and 384-dimensional embeddings" difficulty="intermediate" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
You can now supply the data objects, which will be indexed automatically
when you add them with [hset()]({{< relref "/commands/hset" >}}), as long as
you use the doc: prefix specified in the index definition.
Use the predict() method of the Predictor object
as shown below to create the embedding that represents the content field
and use the floatArrayToByteBuffer() helper method to convert it to a binary string.
Use the binary string representation when you are
indexing hash objects, but use an array of float for
JSON objects (see Differences with JSON objects
below).
You must use instances of Map<ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer> to supply the data to hset()
when using the ByteBufferCodec connection, which adds a little complexity. Note
that the predict() call is in a try/catch block because it will throw
exceptions if it can't download the embedding model (you should add code to handle
the exceptions in production code).
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="add_data" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Generate embeddings and store hash documents with vector data using ByteBufferCodec" difficulty="intermediate" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
After you have created the index and added the data, you are ready to run a query. To do this, you must create another embedding vector from your chosen query text. Redis calculates the vector distance between the query vector and each embedding vector in the index as it runs the query. You can request the results to be sorted to rank them in order of ascending distance.
The code below creates the query embedding using the predict() method, as with
the indexing, and passes it as a parameter when the query executes (see
[Vector search]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/query/vector-search" >}})
for more information about using query parameters with embeddings).
The query is a
[K nearest neighbors (KNN)]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/vectors#knn-vector-search" >}})
search that sorts the results in order of vector distance from the query vector.
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="query" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Semantic search: Execute a KNN vector search with semantic similarity ranking on hash documents" difficulty="advanced" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
Assuming you have added the code from the steps above to your source file,
it is now ready to run, but note that it may take a while to complete when
you run it for the first time (which happens because the model must download the
all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model data before it can
generate the embeddings). When you run the code, it outputs the following result text:
Results:
ID: doc:1, Content: That is a very happy person, Distance: 0.114169836044
ID: doc:2, Content: That is a happy dog, Distance: 0.610845506191
ID: doc:3, Content: Today is a sunny day, Distance: 1.48624765873
Note that the results are ordered according to the value of the distance
field, with the lowest distance indicating the greatest similarity to the query.
As you would expect, the result for doc:1 with the content text
"That is a very happy person"
is the result that is most similar in meaning to the query text
"That is a happy person".
Indexing JSON documents is similar to hash indexing, but there are some
important differences. JSON allows much richer data modeling with nested fields, so
you must supply a [path]({{< relref "/develop/data-types/json/path" >}}) in the schema
to identify each field you want to index. However, you can declare a short alias for each
of these paths (using the as() option) to avoid typing it in full for
every query. Also, you must specify CreateArgs.TargetType.JSON when you create the index.
The code below shows these differences, but the index is otherwise very similar to the one created previously for hashes:
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="json_schema" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Create a vector search index on JSON documents with JSON paths and field aliases" difficulty="intermediate" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
An important difference with JSON indexing is that the vectors are
specified using arrays of float instead of binary strings. This means
you don't need to use the ByteBufferCodec connection, and you can use
Arrays.toString() to convert the float array to a suitable JSON string.
Use [jsonSet()]({{< relref "/commands/json.set" >}}) to add the data
instead of [hset()]({{< relref "/commands/hset" >}}). Use instances
of JSONObject to supply the data instead of Map, as you would for
hash objects.
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="json_data" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Foundational: Store JSON documents with vector embeddings as float arrays using JSON.SET" difficulty="intermediate" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
The query is almost identical to the one for the hash documents. This
demonstrates how the right choice of aliases for the JSON paths can
save you having to write complex queries. An important thing to notice
is that the vector parameter for the query is still specified as a
binary string, even though the data for the embedding field of the JSON
was specified as an array.
{{< clients-example set="home_query_vec" step="json_query" lang_filter="Java-Async,Java-Reactive" description="Semantic search: Execute a KNN vector search on JSON documents with semantic similarity ranking" difficulty="advanced" >}} {{< /clients-example >}}
The distance values are not identical to the hash query because the string representations of the vectors used here are stored with different precisions. However, the relative order of the results is the same:
Results:
ID: jdoc:1, Content: That is a very happy person, Distance: 0.628328084946
ID: jdoc:2, Content: That is a happy dog, Distance: 0.895147025585
ID: jdoc:3, Content: Today is a sunny day, Distance: 1.49569523335
See [Vector search]({{< relref "/develop/ai/search-and-query/query/vector-search" >}}) for more information about the indexing options, distance metrics, and query format for vectors.