Independently re-review plan 11 hosted-review corrections

Review only. Read pinned approved plan 11, current AGENTS.md, RTK, applicable code-review skill, all Plan 11 reports, and two inline comments on PR #3459. Review complete origin/main...HEAD diff at current head.

Verify both hosted wording corrections are coherent: user-facing example uses accessible “sample” terminology without weakening fictional-data safety, and section/link text “Review edits and patches” aligns with exact Review edits UI label while still covering patch inspection and restore. Verify anchor resolution and no stale #review-patches links. Revalidate previous attachment, history, provider capability, isolated AI Draft, patch/restore, scope, and no-invented- motive findings.

Run fresh base/live PR/thread state, relevant source probes and focused tests, Markdown/link/diff/three-doc scope gates. Write .orchestration/plan-11-hosted-review-rereview.md with findings first, exact head, commands/results, skipped gates, risks, and push/thread-resolution verdict. Do not edit tracked files, push, merge, resolve threads, mutate issues, or spawn subagents. Final response at most ten lines.