contrib/minutes/20260424.md
Do all decisions have to be brought to this group? Consensus was "it depends"; some decisions are appropriate for github while others needs to be discussed.
We need external meetings for Podman and friends. Unanimous agreement.
Which sub-projects make sense in the new podman github organization
The container-selinux project was deferred.
Discussion around CNCF incubation and readiness. We agreed that due to the impact of incubation, a majority (or more) of the core maintainers should be in agreement to move forward. And preferably the core maintainers should have an opportunity to review it.
We discussed current state of CI for our repositories. Due to the potential wide-ranging impact of changes to our CI with no involvement of maintainers, we want a maintainer to be part of those efforts in terms of design and approval of approaches and methods.
Core maintainer meeting frequency will now be monthly.
We need to review the MAINTAINERS.md file with regularity. Brent will review Podman's, Miloslav will review Skopeo's, and Tom will review Buildahs.