Problem

slate-history claimed HistoryEditor.withNewBatch(...), HistoryEditor.withoutMerging(...), and editor.writeHistory(...), but the live v2 source only had withMerging(...) and withoutSaving(...).

That left two real problems:

• the public docs were ahead of the actual package surface
• the history writer had no override seam, so writeHistory(...) was cosmetic

Root Cause

The v2 history package moved from legacy per-op wrapping to snapshot-based commit subscribers.

That architecture shift was fine, but the helper recovery stopped halfway:

• the merge/save flags survived
• the split-once flag did not
• new history batches were still pushed directly into history.undos and history.redos

So the old helper names were missing, and the one instance seam serious callers actually need never ran.

Solution

Restore the helper surface in the shape the current engine can honestly support:

• add SPLITTING_ONCE
• restore HistoryEditor.withNewBatch(...)
• restore HistoryEditor.withoutMerging(...)
• restore editor.writeHistory(stack, batch)

Then apply the split-once rule at the commit-subscriber writer, not before it.

In with-history.ts, the correct flow is:

1. derive save and merge for the committed snapshot
2. if SPLITTING_ONCE is set, force merge = false for that commit only
3. clear SPLITTING_ONCE
4. write the fresh batch through editor.writeHistory(...)
5. let later commits inside the same withNewBatch(...) scope merge normally

Why This Works

withNewBatch(...) is not “never merge inside this callback”.

It is:

• split from the previous saved batch once
• then merge normally for the rest of the scope

On a snapshot/commit model, that decision only makes sense at the place where a commit is actually written to history.

Anything earlier is guessing.

Routing all push-style writes through editor.writeHistory(...) also makes the public instance seam real again, so downstream packages can intercept undo/redo batch writes without forking the history plugin.

Prevention

• If a legacy helper is about history batching, recover it at the history write boundary, not at an arbitrary op-prep layer.
• Do not document writeHistory(...) unless commit-time writes actually route through it.
• For snapshot-based history, treat “split once” as a commit-writer concern.
• Keep one contract test for each helper family:
  • withNewBatch(...) splits once, then merges the rest of the scope
  • withoutMerging(...) forces a fresh batch
  • writeHistory(...) is the real stack-write seam