Problem

The ref docs still claimed:

• PathRef.transform(...)
• PointRef.transform(...)
• RangeRef.transform(...)

But the current ref model is not the old mutable helper-struct design.

pathRef is runtime-id backed. pointRef rides the collapsed range-ref seam. rangeRef has custom editor-owned rebasing for fragment insertion and other current-proof cases.

Root Cause

Legacy docs survived a runtime model change.

Static transform helpers made sense when refs were dumb mutable containers that the caller could patch op-by-op.

They do not map cleanly onto current refs, because the editor owns the real rebasing semantics.

Solution

Cut the fake static helper claim from the docs.

Document the actual public contract instead:

• create refs through Editor.*Ref(...)
• read current
• call unref()
• let the editor own updates

Why This Works

This is a better cut than fake parity.

Shipping a RangeRef.transform(...) that cannot honestly mirror the editor's current rebasing rules would be worse than having no helper at all.

Prevention

• Do not restore legacy helper names just because the docs remember them.
• If a runtime handle is editor-owned, document it as editor-owned.
• If a legacy helper cannot match current semantics without lying, cut the claim and say so plainly.