Dynamic input rule families should branch inside createRuleFactory

Problem

Some package-owned rule families need one semantic public entrypoint, but they do not map to one internal rule lane.

Examples:

• MathRules.markdown(...) needs inline $...$ entry on insertText and block $$ entry on blockFence.
• LinkRules.autolink(...) needs insertText, insertBreak, and insertData variants under one semantic family.

The bad fix is to keep the public family but hand-write a wrapper that chooses between multiple internal createRuleFactory(...) calls.

What Didn't Work

• Wrapper exports like:

markdown: (options: MathMarkdownRuleOptions) =>
  options.variant === '$$'
    ? createRuleFactory(...)(options)
    : createRuleFactory(...)(options)

• Manual option unions that forgot shared runtime fields like enabled and priority.
• Re-declaring public types in package files instead of letting the factory own the contract.
• Treating the wrapper as harmless because the runtime behavior still worked.

The runtime still worked. The public typing rotted.

Solution

Let createRuleFactory(...) accept a dynamic config callback so the package export still comes directly from the factory:

export const MathRules = {
  markdown: createRuleFactory<
    { variant: '$' } | { on: 'break' | 'match'; variant: '$$' }
  >((options) =>
    options.variant === '$$'
      ? {
          type: 'blockFence',
          fence: '$$',
          block: KEYS.p,
          on: options.on,
          apply: ({ editor }, match) => {
            const blockMatch = match as BlockFenceInputRuleMatch;
            // feature semantics
            return true;
          },
        }
      : {
          type: 'insertText',
          trigger: '$',
          apply: ({ editor }, match) => {
            const inlineMatch = match as InlineMathMatch;
            // feature semantics
            return true;
          },
        }
  ),
};

Same idea for link autolink:

export const LinkRules = {
  autolink: createRuleFactory<{ variant: 'break' | 'paste' | 'space' }>(
    (options) =>
      options.variant === 'break'
        ? { type: 'insertBreak', ... }
        : options.variant === 'paste'
          ? { type: 'insertData', ... }
          : { type: 'insertText', ... }
  ),
};

The export is still factory-owned. The branching moved inside the factory callback, where it belongs.

Why This Works

• The package export stops re-declaring the public API.
• Shared runtime fields like enabled and priority come from the factory contract automatically.
• Package files still own feature semantics and variant selection.
• Core owns the typing and construction seam for dynamic rule families.

The only compromise is local narrowing inside apply(...) for branch-specific match payloads. That is still better than a wrapper export because the public contract stays factory-owned.

Prevention

• If one semantic rule family fans out to multiple internal rule lanes, branch inside createRuleFactory(...).
• Do not write wrapper exports that call multiple factories and forward the same options.
• Keep package exports semantic. Keep constructor authority in the factory.
• Accept local payload narrowing inside branch-specific apply(...) when the runtime shape is known, instead of reintroducing a fake wrapper API.