Research Maintenance

Primary reusable entrypoint:

• $research-wiki

Recommended command name:

• research-maintain

Suggested invocation shape:

research-maintain <area?>

Examples:

research-maintain
research-maintain editor behavior references
research-maintain plate v2 architecture

Purpose

Run the upkeep pass for the research layer.

This command is lighter than full-pipeline.md.

It is the maintain-mode sub-workflow for research-wiki.

It is for keeping existing research healthy, not for opening a whole new lane from scratch.

When To Use

Use research-maintain when:

• the research layer already has coverage in the area
• you want to detect stale or missing compiled pages
• you want to find contradictions, orphan pages, or weak sourcing
• a task feels bigger than the visible pages, but not big enough for a full new ingest push

Do not use it when:

• starting a brand-new domain from near zero
• the relevant raw corpus does not exist yet
• you already know you need a full research pass

Outputs

Expected outputs:

• updated stale compiled pages when the evidence is already available
• missing index.md and backlink fixes
• explicit gap report for what is still missing
• appended log.md

Loop

1. Scope the area

If an area is provided, infer the likely:

• entities
• concepts
• systems
• decisions

If no area is provided, run a broad upkeep pass across the current research layer.

2. Read compiled coverage first

Read:

1. index.md
2. the relevant compiled pages

3. Check for upkeep gaps

Look for:

• stale pages
• contradictions
• orphan pages
• duplicated pages
• weakly sourced claims
• missing compiled summaries for raw evidence that already exists
• missing concept/system/decision pages where source summaries already imply them

4. Fill safe gaps

Safe actions:

• update stale summaries from already-known evidence
• add missing backlinks and index entries
• split mixed pages
• create missing stubs when source support is obvious
• open explicit open-questions/... pages instead of faking certainty

Unsafe actions:

• inventing new decisions without enough evidence
• pretending the area is complete because some pages exist
• silently flattening contradictions

5. Report what remains

Return:

• what was fixed
• what was still missing
• whether the area now needs full-pipeline.md instead

Rule Of Thumb

research-full is for building or rebuilding a lane.

research-maintain is for keeping a lane honest.