Back to Paperclip

Create and develop a Paperclip plugin

skills/paperclip-create-plugin/SKILL.md

2026.513.06.1 KB
Original Source

Create and develop a Paperclip plugin

Use this skill when the task is to create, scaffold, or iterate on a Paperclip plugin against a local Paperclip instance.

1. Default: build the plugin OUTSIDE Paperclip core

Plugins are their own packages. Unless the task explicitly asks for a bundled in-repo example, do not add plugin source under packages/plugins/ in this repo.

  • Scaffold the plugin into a directory outside the Paperclip checkout (e.g. ~/dev/paperclip-plugins/<name>).
  • Install it into the running Paperclip instance by local absolute path.
  • Edit code in the external package; let Paperclip pick up rebuilt output.

Only edit Paperclip core itself when the user asks to surface a plugin as a bundled example (server/src/routes/plugins.ts, in-repo example lists, docs).

2. Ground rules

Reference docs when you need detail:

  1. doc/plugins/PLUGIN_AUTHORING_GUIDE.md
  2. packages/plugins/sdk/README.md
  3. doc/plugins/PLUGIN_SPEC.md — future-looking context only

Current runtime assumptions:

  • plugin workers are trusted code
  • plugin UI is trusted same-origin host code
  • worker APIs are capability-gated
  • plugin UI is not sandboxed by manifest capabilities
  • no host-provided shared plugin UI component kit yet
  • ctx.assets is not supported in the current runtime

3. CLI-first scaffold workflow

Use paperclipai plugin init. Do not invoke the scaffold package node entrypoint by hand unless the CLI command is unavailable in the environment.

bash
paperclipai plugin init @acme/my-plugin --output ~/dev/paperclip-plugins

Useful flags (all optional):

  • --output <dir> — parent directory; the command creates <dir>/<unscoped-name>/. Defaults to the current directory.
  • --template <default|connector|workspace|environment> — starter template.
  • --category <connector|workspace|automation|ui|environment> — manifest category.
  • --display-name <name>, --description <text>, --author <name> — manifest metadata.
  • --sdk-path <path> — snapshot the local SDK from a Paperclip checkout into .paperclip-sdk/ (useful when developing against an unreleased SDK).

On success the command prints the exact next commands (cd, pnpm install, pnpm dev, paperclipai plugin install <abs-path>). Run them in order.

If paperclipai is not on PATH in your environment, fall back to:

bash
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/create-paperclip-plugin build
node packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin/dist/index.js @acme/my-plugin \
  --output /absolute/path \
  --sdk-path /absolute/path/to/paperclip/packages/plugins/sdk

4. Local install + rebuild loop

In the scaffolded plugin folder:

bash
pnpm install
pnpm dev            # esbuild --watch: rebuilds dist/manifest.js, dist/worker.js, dist/ui/
paperclipai plugin install /absolute/path/to/my-plugin

Notes:

  • paperclipai plugin install auto-detects local paths (absolute, ./, ../, ~, or an existing relative folder) and forwards isLocalPath: true to the server. Pass --local to force local mode if the heuristic is ambiguous.
  • Paths are resolved to absolute paths before being sent to the server.
  • The server watches built outputs (dist/) for local-path plugins and restarts the plugin worker on rebuild — you do not need to reinstall after every edit.
  • UI hot reload via the SDK dev server (pnpm dev:ui, port 4177) is optional and template-dependent; only mention it if the template wires devUiUrl and you verified it works end to end.
  • --version only applies to npm package installs. Combining it with a local path is an error.

After install, inspect with:

bash
paperclipai plugin list
paperclipai plugin inspect <plugin-key>

5. After scaffolding, sanity-check the package

Open and confirm:

  • src/manifest.ts — declared capabilities and slots
  • src/worker.ts — worker entry
  • src/ui/index.tsx — UI entry (if applicable)
  • tests/plugin.spec.ts — placeholder test
  • package.jsonpaperclipPlugin block points at dist/manifest.js, dist/worker.js, dist/ui/

Make sure the plugin:

  • declares only supported capabilities
  • does not use ctx.assets
  • does not import host UI component stubs
  • keeps UI self-contained
  • uses routePath only on page slots

6. Verification (run before declaring success)

From the plugin folder:

bash
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test
pnpm build

If the plugin is already running under pnpm dev, you can keep the watcher up and run pnpm typecheck and pnpm test in a separate shell.

If you changed Paperclip SDK/host/plugin runtime code in addition to the plugin, also run the relevant Paperclip workspace checks.

7. Success checklist (report this back)

When you finish a local plugin task, report:

  • Scaffold path — absolute path of the created plugin folder.
  • Commands run — the exact paperclipai plugin init, pnpm install, pnpm dev, paperclipai plugin install <path> invocations (and any verification commands).
  • Install status — output of paperclipai plugin list / plugin inspect (plugin key, version, status). Note if status is anything other than ready and include lastError.
  • Tests / build resultpnpm typecheck, pnpm test, pnpm build pass/fail with the failing output if any.
  • Reload limitations — call out anything that did not hot-reload (e.g. manifest changes required a reinstall, UI dev server was not wired, etc.).

If any item is missing, mark it as such — do not silently skip.

8. When NOT to edit Paperclip core

Do not add the plugin under packages/plugins/ or update bundled-example wiring unless the user explicitly asks for a bundled example. Local-path installs are the supported development model; npm packages are the production deployment path.

If the user does ask for a bundled example, also update:

  • server/src/routes/plugins.ts example list
  • any docs that enumerate in-repo example plugins

9. Documentation expectations

When authoring or updating plugin docs:

  • distinguish current implementation from future spec ideas
  • be explicit about the trusted-code model
  • do not promise host UI components or asset APIs
  • prefer local-path development + npm-package deployment guidance over repo-local workflows