skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
Planning boundary: This workflow creates planning artifacts only. The user request that selected or triggered this workflow authorizes planning only, even if it asks to build or fix something. Do not edit project code. After the planning artifacts are complete, stop. Do not start implementation in the same response, even if the initial request asks for it. Wait for a new user request after the artifacts are presented; then start the apply workflow.
I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
specs/<capability-path>/spec.md (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve an existing capability's full path and follow the project's established organization for new capabilities.
When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
Understand the request and clarify material ambiguity
If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).
IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria, ask the user before creating the change. For minor details, make a reasonable assumption and record it in the planning artifacts.
Determine the workflow schema
Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.
Use a different schema only if the user:
--schema <schema-name>openspec context --json from the current working directory. If the user explicitly selected a registered store, use openspec context --json --store "<store-id>". Then run openspec schemas --json with its working directory set to the returned root.path and let them choose. This preserves roots selected by a local store: pointer or the global defaultStore; schemas does not accept --store. If context reports only no_openspec_root, run openspec schemas --json from the current working directory instead. Do not use this fallback for invalid or unavailable stores.Otherwise, omit --schema to preserve the configured default.
Create the change directory
Choose one schema form below. If a registered store is selected, append --store "<store-id>" to that command and each later OpenSpec command shown below that accepts --store.
Using the configured default:
openspec new change "<name>"
Using an explicitly requested schema:
openspec new change "<name>" --schema "<schema-name>"
This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with .openspec.yaml.
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for contextinstruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at resolvedOutputPathtemplate as the structure and write it to resolvedOutputPath. If resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose the concrete file pathcontext and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the fileb. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires)
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonapplyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alonestatus is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends onstatus: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create onestatus already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider itblocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anywaydone, skipped, or was deliberately skippedc. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
/openspec-apply-change or ask me to apply this change."Artifact Creation Guidelines
instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact namesinstruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directlytemplate as the structure for your output file - fill in its sectionscontext and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
<context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifactGuardrails
apply.requires