skills/openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select oneWhen prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")lastModified field)Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /openspec-continue-change <other>).
Check current status
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as isComplete.planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.Act based on status:
If all planning artifacts are complete (isPlanningComplete: true, or legacy isComplete: true):
If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with status: "ready"):
status: "ready" from the status outputopenspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidanceresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context (entries with skipped: true have no files - do not look for them)skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - pick another artifactinstruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at resolvedOutputPathtemplate as the structure - fill in its sectionscontext and rules as constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the fileresolvedOutputPath specified in instructions. If it is a glob pattern, choose the concrete file path using the schema instruction and the change's contextIf no artifacts are ready (all blocked):
After creating an artifact, show progress
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After each invocation, show:
Artifact Creation Guidelines
The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. The instruction field from the instructions output is the authoritative guidance for each artifact - follow it even when the artifact has a familiar name (proposal.md, tasks.md, etc.), since custom schemas may define different content or a different process for the same file names.
If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly.
Guardrails
context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
<context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact