docs/customization.md
OpenSpec provides three levels of customization:
| Level | What it does | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Project Config | Set defaults, inject context/rules | Most teams |
| Custom Schemas | Define your own workflow artifacts | Teams with unique processes |
| Global Overrides | Share schemas across all projects | Power users |
The openspec/config.yaml file is the easiest way to customize OpenSpec for your team. It lets you:
--schema on every commandopenspec init
This walks you through creating a config interactively. Or create one manually:
# openspec/config.yaml
schema: spec-driven
context: |
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js, PostgreSQL
API style: RESTful, documented in docs/api.md
Testing: Jest + React Testing Library
We value backwards compatibility for all public APIs
rules:
proposal:
- Include rollback plan
- Identify affected teams
specs:
- Use Given/When/Then format
- Reference existing patterns before inventing new ones
operations:
apply:
guidance:
- Run focused tests before the full suite
archive:
guidance:
- Keep the completion summary concise
Default schema:
# Without config
openspec new change my-feature --schema spec-driven
# With config - schema is automatic
openspec new change my-feature
Context and rules injection:
When generating any artifact, your context and rules are injected into the AI prompt:
<context>
Tech stack: TypeScript, React, Node.js, PostgreSQL
...
</context>
<rules>
- Include rollback plan
- Identify affected teams
</rules>
<template>
[Schema's built-in template]
</template>
Operation guidance:
operations.apply.guidance and operations.archive.guidance are optional arrays
of advisory instructions for how an agent should conduct those operations. They
are separate from rules: operation guidance does not constrain artifact content,
and artifact rules are never relabeled as operation guidance.
Apply and archive fetch these inputs at execution time:
openspec instructions apply --change my-feature --json
openspec instructions archive --change my-feature --json
Both surfaces return current project context and matching
operationGuidance as separate optional fields. Each invocation reads a fresh
snapshot from the resolved root. When --store <id> is selected, the change,
context, and guidance all come from that store rather than the current repository.
The archive instruction command is read-only: it does not inspect or merge delta
specs, write main specs, move the change, or run the static archive workflow.
Project context is a required prompt-level input. Generated workflows read it and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints. Operation guidance is optional additive advice: workflows consider every entry and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in workflow.
Both fields remain separate from CLI-controlled state, resolved paths, built-in steps, explicit user choices, and artifact rules. A workflow reports context conflicts while preserving the controlling value. It does not follow inapplicable or conflicting guidance and explains why. Neither field is an enforceable check, and workflows do not copy their text into implementation files, specs, change artifacts, or summaries unless the user separately requests that content.
Archive and spec-sync input safety:
Archive, bulk archive, and standalone sync use
artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths from openspec status --json as the
only delta-spec source. A schema without a specs artifact, or a change whose
concrete output list is empty, has nothing to sync; other artifacts are not used
to infer delta specs.
Before a semantic merge writes a main spec, the workflow consumes current
openspec instructions specs --change <name> --json output. The returned
specs rules constrain only the main specs produced by that merge. Single archive
passes that snapshot into inline sync, standalone sync fetches it directly, and
bulk archive obtains every required snapshot before its first spec write. A
non-zero or invalid JSON archive/specs instruction response is a lookup failure,
not an empty input: the workflow stops before the affected spec write or change
move (for bulk archive, before any batch write or move).
This configuration does not change archive execution phases, user prompts,
filesystem operations, semantic merge ownership, the direct openspec archive
command, or the structure and output of artifact rules.
When OpenSpec needs a schema, it checks in this order:
--schema <name>.openspec.yaml in the change folder)openspec/config.yaml)spec-driven)When project config isn't enough, create your own schema with a completely custom workflow. Custom schemas live in your project's openspec/schemas/ directory and are version-controlled with your code.
your-project/
├── openspec/
│ ├── config.yaml # Project config
│ ├── schemas/ # Custom schemas live here
│ │ └── my-workflow/
│ │ ├── schema.yaml
│ │ └── templates/
│ └── changes/ # Your changes
└── src/
The fastest way to customize is to fork a built-in schema:
openspec schema fork spec-driven my-workflow
This copies the entire spec-driven schema to openspec/schemas/my-workflow/ where you can edit it freely.
What you get:
openspec/schemas/my-workflow/
├── schema.yaml # Workflow definition
└── templates/
├── proposal.md # Template for proposal artifact
├── spec.md # Template for specs
├── design.md # Template for design
└── tasks.md # Template for tasks
Now edit schema.yaml to change the workflow, or edit templates to change what AI generates.
For a completely fresh workflow:
# Interactive
openspec schema init research-first
# Non-interactive
openspec schema init rapid \
--description "Rapid iteration workflow" \
--artifacts "proposal,tasks" \
--default
A schema defines the artifacts in your workflow and how they depend on each other:
# openspec/schemas/my-workflow/schema.yaml
name: my-workflow
version: 1
description: My team's custom workflow
artifacts:
- id: proposal
generates: proposal.md
description: Initial proposal document
template: proposal.md
instruction: |
Create a proposal that explains WHY this change is needed.
Focus on the problem, not the solution.
requires: []
- id: design
generates: design.md
description: Technical design
template: design.md
instruction: |
Create a design document explaining HOW to implement.
requires:
- proposal # Can't create design until proposal exists
- id: tasks
generates: tasks.md
description: Implementation checklist
template: tasks.md
requires:
- design
apply:
requires: [tasks]
tracks: tasks.md
Key fields:
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
id | Unique identifier, used in commands and rules |
generates | Output filename (supports globs like specs/**/*.md) |
template | Template file in templates/ directory |
instruction | AI instructions for creating this artifact |
requires | Dependencies - which artifacts must exist first |
List artifacts in the order you want them written. requires decides what is
possible; the order of the artifacts: list decides what comes first when
several artifacts are ready at once.
Templates are markdown files that guide the AI. They're injected into the prompt when creating that artifact.
<!-- templates/proposal.md -->
## Why
<!-- Explain the motivation for this change. What problem does this solve? -->
## What Changes
<!-- Describe what will change. Be specific about new capabilities or modifications. -->
## Impact
<!-- Affected code, APIs, dependencies, systems -->
Templates can include:
Before using a custom schema, validate it:
openspec schema validate my-workflow
This checks:
schema.yaml syntax is correctOnce created, use your schema with:
# Specify on command
openspec new change feature --schema my-workflow
# Or set as default in config.yaml
schema: my-workflow
Not sure which schema is being used? Check with:
# See where a specific schema resolves from
openspec schema which my-workflow
# List all available schemas
openspec schema which --all
Output shows whether it's from your project, user directory, or the package:
Schema: my-workflow
Source: project
Path: /path/to/project/openspec/schemas/my-workflow
Note: OpenSpec also supports user-level schemas at
~/.local/share/openspec/schemas/for sharing across projects, but project-level schemas inopenspec/schemas/are recommended since they're version-controlled with your code.
A minimal workflow for quick iterations:
# openspec/schemas/rapid/schema.yaml
name: rapid
version: 1
description: Fast iteration with minimal overhead
artifacts:
- id: proposal
generates: proposal.md
description: Quick proposal
template: proposal.md
instruction: |
Create a brief proposal for this change.
Focus on what and why, skip detailed specs.
requires: []
- id: tasks
generates: tasks.md
description: Implementation checklist
template: tasks.md
requires: [proposal]
apply:
requires: [tasks]
tracks: tasks.md
Fork the default and add a review step:
openspec schema fork spec-driven with-review
Then edit schema.yaml to add:
- id: review
generates: review.md
description: Pre-implementation review checklist
template: review.md
instruction: |
Create a review checklist based on the design.
Include security, performance, and testing considerations.
requires:
- design
- id: tasks
# ... existing tasks config ...
requires:
- specs
- design
- review # Now tasks require review too
OpenSpec also supports community-maintained schemas distributed via standalone repositories. These provide opinionated workflows that integrate OpenSpec with other tools or systems, similar to how github/spec-kit's community extension catalog works for spec-kit.
Community schemas are not vendored into OpenSpec core — they live in their own repositories with their own release cadence. To use one, copy the schema bundle into your project's openspec/schemas/<schema-name>/ directory (each repo's README has install instructions).
| Schema | Maintainer | Repository | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
superpowers-bridge | @JiangWay | JiangWay/openspec-schemas | Integrates OpenSpec's artifact governance with obra/superpowers execution skills (brainstorming, writing-plans, TDD via subagents, code review, finishing). Adds an evidence-first retrospective artifact filling a gap Superpowers does not natively cover. |
nanopm | @nmrtn | nmrtn/nanopm | PM-first workflow. Runs nanopm's planning pipeline (audit → strategy → roadmap → PRD) upstream of implementation. Bridges product planning to OpenSpec's spec-driven engineering workflow. Artifacts read from .nanopm/ if present — proposal sources the audit, design sources the strategy, and tasks source the PRD breakdown. |
e2e-runbooks | @Lukk17 | Lukk17/openspec-schemas | Capability-level end-to-end test runbooks. Each capability gets an immutable spec, an immutable tasks-template, and one timestamped run record per execution. Assertions are observable behaviour only (HTTP status, response body, persisted state — never log substrings); each run records start/end UTC, duration, and best-estimate LLM token consumption. |
anvil | @jikkujoyce | jikkujoyce/openspec-schemas | Spec-driven workflow with TDD discipline and an adversarial review step. Flow: proposal → specs → design → review → test-plan → tasks → apply → verify. review is written by a fresh-context, read-only reviewer (a second model when one is available) and emits a VERDICT: line telling the agent to gate test-plan, tasks, and apply; OpenSpec only checks that artifacts exist, so enforce the gate with your own CI or hook. test-plan maps every spec scenario to a named test and doubles as a red/green ledger that verify audits. |
Want to contribute a community schema? Open an issue with a link to your repository, or submit a PR adding a row to this table.