Back to Openspec

Stores: Plan in Its Own Repo

docs/stores-beta/user-guide.md

1.5.012.9 KB
Original Source

Stores: Plan in Its Own Repo

Beta. Stores, references, working context, and worksets are new. Command names, flags, file formats, and JSON output may still change shape between releases. Every walkthrough below was run against the current build, but re-read this guide after upgrading.

The problem this solves

OpenSpec normally lives inside one code repo: an openspec/ folder next to your code, holding specs and changes for that repo.

That stops fitting the moment your planning is bigger than one repo:

  • Your work spans several repos — one feature touches the API server, the web app, and a shared library. Whose openspec/ folder does the plan live in?
  • Your team plans before code exists, or plans things that never become code in this repo.
  • Requirements are owned by one team and consumed by others. The wiki version drifts, and your coding agent can't read it anyway.

A store is the answer: a standalone repo whose whole job is planning. It has the same openspec/ shape you already know — specs and changes — plus a small identity file. You register it on your machine once, by name, and then every normal OpenSpec command can work in it from anywhere.

The shape

            team-plans  (a store: planning in its own repo)
            ├── .openspec-store/store.yaml     identity: "I am team-plans"
            └── openspec/
                ├── specs/      what is true
                └── changes/    what is in motion
                      ▲
                      │ registered on each machine by name;
                      │ shared by pushing/cloning like any repo
        ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
        │             │             │
    web-app       api-server     mobile-app
   (code repo)   (code repo)    (code repo)

Two rules keep this simple:

  1. A store is just a git repo. You commit, push, pull, and review it yourself. OpenSpec never clones, syncs, or pushes anything on its own.
  2. Declarations, not machinery. Repos can declare how they relate to stores (shown below). Declarations change what OpenSpec can tell you — never where your commands act.

Five minutes to your first store

Two commands take you from nothing to a working, store-scoped change:

bash
openspec store setup team-plans --path ~/openspec/team-plans
Store ready: team-plans
Location: /Users/you/openspec/team-plans
OpenSpec root: ready
Registry: registered

Next: run normal OpenSpec commands against this store, for example:
  openspec new change <change-id> --store team-plans
Share this store by committing and pushing it like any Git repo.
bash
openspec new change add-login --store team-plans
Using OpenSpec root: team-plans (/Users/you/openspec/team-plans)
Created change 'add-login' at /Users/you/openspec/team-plans/openspec/changes/add-login/
Schema: spec-driven
Next: openspec status --change add-login --store team-plans

That's the whole model. From here the lifecycle is exactly what you know — status, instructions, validate, archive — with --store team-plans on each command, and every printed hint carries the flag for you. The Using OpenSpec root: line always tells you where a command is acting.

Story: one team, one planning repo

A team keeps its specs and changes in team-plans instead of scattering them across code repos.

Day one (whoever sets it up):

bash
openspec store setup team-plans --path ~/openspec/team-plans \
  --remote [email protected]:acme/team-plans.git
git -C ~/openspec/team-plans push -u origin main

Passing --remote records the clone URL inside the store's own identity file (.openspec-store/store.yaml), in the initial commit. Every future clone is born knowing where it came from, so health checks and error messages can print a complete, pasteable fix for teammates who don't have it yet.

Every teammate (once per machine):

bash
git clone [email protected]:acme/team-plans.git ~/openspec/team-plans
openspec store register ~/openspec/team-plans

From then on, everyone works in the same planning repo by name:

bash
openspec status --store team-plans --change add-login
openspec show add-login --store team-plans

Sharing work is git, on purpose. A change you create exists only in your checkout until you commit and push it — same as code. Plans get branches, pull requests, and review for free, because a store is an ordinary repo.

Connecting the team's code repos. A code repo whose planning is fully externalized needs exactly one line, in openspec/config.yaml:

yaml
# web-app/openspec/config.yaml
store: team-plans

Now every OpenSpec command run inside web-app acts on team-plans with no flags at all:

bash
cd ~/src/web-app
openspec status --change add-login
Using OpenSpec root: team-plans (/Users/you/openspec/team-plans)
...

The pointer is a fallback, never an override: an explicit --store always wins, and if the repo grows real planning folders of its own, those win (with a warning to remove the stale pointer).

Story: requirements that cross team lines

A platform team owns the requirements. Product teams build against them, in their own repos, with their own designs. A reference describes that relationship without moving anyone's work.

   platform-reqs (store)                 api-server (code repo)
   owned by the platform team            owned by a product team
   ┌──────────────────────────┐          ┌──────────────────────────┐
   │ openspec/specs/          │ ◀────────│ openspec/config.yaml     │
   │   payments/spec.md       │ reads    │   references:            │
   │   auth/spec.md           │          │     - platform-reqs      │
   │                          │          │ openspec/specs/          │
   │ openspec/changes/        │          │   (their own designs)    │
   │   platform work          │          │ openspec/changes/        │
   │                          │          │   (their own work)       │
   │                          │          └──────────────────────────┘
   └──────────────────────────┘

The product team declares what it draws on in its repo's openspec/config.yaml:

yaml
references:
  - platform-reqs

References are read-only context. The repo keeps its own openspec/ root; work stays there. What changes: openspec instructions in that repo now includes an index of the referenced store's specs — each with a one-line summary and the exact fetch command (openspec show <spec-id> --type spec --store platform-reqs). An agent working in api-server can find the upstream payment requirements, cite them, and write its low-level design in the repo's own root — without anyone pasting context around.

A reference can carry its clone source, so teammates who don't have the store yet get a complete fix instead of a dead end:

yaml
references:
  - { id: platform-reqs, remote: "[email protected]:acme/platform-reqs.git" }

When you want the plan and code open together, make a workset. This is personal and explicit: each person chooses the folders they actually work with on their machine. Nothing about those local checkout paths is committed to the shared planning repo.

bash
openspec workset create platform \
  --member ~/openspec/platform-reqs \
  --member ~/src/api-server \
  --member ~/src/web-app

Two questions you can always ask

"Is my setup healthy?"openspec doctor checks the current root and its referenced stores, read-only, with a pasteable fix per finding:

Doctor

Root
  Location: /Users/you/src/api-server
  OpenSpec root: ok

References
  - platform-reqs: ok (/Users/you/openspec/platform-reqs)
  - design-system: Referenced store 'design-system' is not registered on this machine.
    Fix: git clone -- [email protected]:acme/design-system.git '/Users/you/openspec/design-system' && openspec store register '/Users/you/openspec/design-system' --id design-system

"What am I working with?"openspec context assembles the working set from OpenSpec declarations: the root and the stores it references.

Working context for api-server (/Users/you/src/api-server)

OpenSpec root
  api-server  /Users/you/src/api-server

Referenced stores
  platform-reqs  /Users/you/openspec/platform-reqs
    Fetch: openspec show <spec-id> --type spec --store platform-reqs

Both support --json for agents. openspec context --code-workspace <path> additionally writes a VS Code workspace file containing the whole set — the only write this command performs.

Worksets: reopen the folders you work on together

Separate from all of the above: most people open the same few folders together every session — the planning repo plus two or three code repos. A workset is a personal, named view of exactly that, reopened with one command in your tool of choice.

  workset "platform"                 openspec workset open platform
  ├── team-plans   ~/openspec/team-plans         │
  ├── api-server   ~/src/api-server              ▼
  └── web-app      ~/src/web-app       all three open in your tool
bash
openspec workset create platform \
  --member ~/openspec/team-plans --member ~/src/api-server \
  --tool code
openspec workset list
platform  (opens in VS Code)
  team-plans  /Users/you/openspec/team-plans
  api-server  /Users/you/src/api-server

openspec workset open platform then launches the saved tool: editors (VS Code, Cursor) open one window with every member and return. The first member is the primary. Override the tool any time with --tool <id>.

Worksets are deliberately not shared state. They live on your machine, are never committed, and make no claims about the work — they only record what you like open together. Removing one never touches the member folders. New tools are configuration, not code: anything launched via a workspace file or per-folder attach flags can be added under the openers key in the global config (openspec config edit).

How commands decide where to act

Every normal command resolves its root the same way, in this order:

1. --store <id>          you said so explicitly        → that store
2. nearest openspec/     a real planning root here     → this repo
   (walking up from cwd)
3. store: pointer        config.yaml declares a store  → that store
4. none of the above     stores registered on this     → error with a
                         machine?                        selection hint
                         no stores registered?         → the current
                                                          directory
                                                          (classic behavior)

The Using OpenSpec root: line (and the root block in --json output) tells you which case you're in.

Known limitations

  • Beta shape. Everything on this page may change between releases — names, flags, file formats, JSON keys.
  • One checkout per store id per machine. Registering a second checkout under the same id fails with a hint to store unregister first.
  • No sync, ever — by design. OpenSpec never clones, pulls, or pushes. A stale checkout shows stale specs until you pull; references are indexed live from whatever is on disk.
  • Some commands stay where they are. view, templates, schemas, and the deprecated noun forms (openspec change show, ...) act on the current directory only — no --store.
  • Per-machine state is per-machine. The store registry and worksets are local settings. Nothing about your machine's layout is ever committed to shared planning.
  • Two launch styles for worksets. A tool that can't be launched with a workspace file or per-folder attach flags can't be added as an opener.
  • Agent JSON has a known casing split (store-family keys are snake_case, workflow-family camelCase). Documented in the agent contract; unifying it is deferred to a versioned release.

Where things live

WhatWhereShared?
A store's planning<store>/openspec/ (specs, changes)Yes — commit and push it
A store's identity<store>/.openspec-store/store.yamlYes — committed with the store
The store registry<data dir>/openspec/stores/registry.yamlNo — this machine only
Worksets<data dir>/openspec/worksets/No — this machine only

<data dir> is ~/.local/share/openspec on macOS and Linux (or $XDG_DATA_HOME/openspec when set), and %LOCALAPPDATA%\openspec on Windows.

Reference

Exact flags and JSON shapes for every command on this page: CLI reference (Stores, Doctor, Working context, Personal worksets) and the agent contract.