OpenClaw QA Scenario Pack

Single source of truth for repo-backed QA suite bootstrap data. qa-lab should treat this directory as a generic markdown scenario pack:

• index.md defines pack-level bootstrap data

• each nested *.md scenario defines one runnable test via qa-scenario + qa-flow

• scenario markdown may also define coverage IDs, category metadata, required plugins, lane filters, runtime parity tiers, and gateway config patching

• kickoff mission

• QA operator identity

• scenario files under one-level theme directories

Coverage tracking:

• add coverage.primary IDs to each scenario's qa-scenario block
• add coverage.secondary only when a scenario intentionally protects another behavior
• keep IDs behavior-shaped, broad enough to reuse, lowercase, and dotted or dashed
• prefer reusing an existing feature ID over minting a scenario-shaped ID
• avoid copying the scenario title into coverage IDs
• use pnpm openclaw qa coverage to render the current inventory
• use runtimeParityTier for runtime-pair gate membership: standard, optional, live-only, or soak
• treat the old coverage: ["id"] / coverage: - id list shape as invalid
• keep source-path tracking in the report, not in the scenario schema

Runtime parity tiers:

• standard: required Codex-vs-Pi mock gate coverage for first-hour depth and default runtime-tool fixtures. OpenClaw dynamic integration tools in this tier are hard-gated by openclaw qa coverage --tools --summary; Codex-native workspace rows remain separately tracked until native/live behavior is the asserted surface. Selected with openclaw qa suite --runtime-pair pi,codex --runtime-parity-tier standard
• optional: profile-, plugin-, or external-service-dependent runtime-tool fixtures that stay out of the default release gate
• live-only: scenarios that need real provider/runtime behavior rather than mock-openai fixtures
• soak: long-running scheduled or Testbox lanes such as the 100-turn parity soak

Theme directories:

• agents/ - agent behavior, instructions, subagent flows, and persisted child-link regressions
• channels/ - DM, shared channel, thread, and message-action behavior
• character/ - persona and style eval scenarios
• config/ - config patch, apply, and restart behavior
• media/ - image understanding and generation
• memory/ - recall, ranking, active memory, and thread isolation
• models/ - provider capabilities and model switching
• personal/ - local personal assistant workflow checks for reminders, replies, memory, redaction, and safe tool followthrough
• plugins/ - plugin, skill, and MCP tool integration
• runtime/ - turn recovery, compaction, approval, and inventory behavior
• scheduling/ - cron and recurring work
• ui/ - Control UI plus qa-channel flows
• workspace/ - repo-reading and workspace artifact tasks

version: 1
agent:
  identityMarkdown: |-
    # Dev C-3PO

    You are the OpenClaw QA operator agent.

    Persona:
    - protocol-minded
    - precise
    - a little flustered
    - conscientious
    - eager to report what worked, failed, or remains blocked

    Style:
    - read source and docs first
    - test systematically
    - record evidence
    - end with a concise protocol report
kickoffTask: |-
  QA mission:
  Understand this OpenClaw repo from source + docs before acting.
  The repo is available in your workspace at `./repo/`.
  Use the seeded QA scenario plan as your baseline, then add more scenarios if the code/docs suggest them.
  Run the scenarios through the real qa-channel surfaces where possible.
  Track what worked, what failed, what was blocked, and what evidence you observed.
  End with a concise report grouped into worked / failed / blocked / follow-up.

  Important expectations:

  - Check both DM and channel behavior.
  - Include a Lobster Invaders build task.
  - Include a cron reminder about one minute in the future.
  - Read docs and source before proposing extra QA scenarios.
  - Keep your tone in the configured dev C-3PO personality.