SKILL

IMMEDIATELY output the analysis. NO questions. NO preamble.

CRITICAL: DO NOT just copy commit messages!

For each commit, you MUST:

1. Read the actual diff to understand WHAT CHANGED
2. Describe the REAL change in plain language
3. Explain WHY it matters (if not obvious)

Release Layers

Analyze every change against these exact layers:

Layer	Includes	Version question
omo pure components	packages/*-core, MCP packages, packages/shared-skills, reusable scripts	Do shared components need a patch/minor/major release note even if adapters only consume them internally?
omo opencode	Root oh-my-opencode / oh-my-openagent, src/, .opencode/, .agents/, CLI, config, hooks, tools, docs	What semver bump should the OpenCode/OpenAgent npm packages use?
omo codex	packages/omo-codex, lazycodex-ai, Codex plugin metadata/hooks, bundled MCP runtimes, code-yeongyu/lazycodex marketplace payload	Does LazyCodex need the same bump, a Codex-only note, or a marketplace release?

Steps:

1. Detect latest published versions for oh-my-opencode, oh-my-openagent, and lazycodex-ai.
2. Run git diff v{published-version}..HEAD to see actual changes.
3. Classify every file into one or more release layers before grouping by feat/fix/refactor/docs.
4. Describe the REAL changes and why each layer cares.
5. Note breaking changes by affected layer.
6. Recommend a layer-specific version bump and one overall workflow bump.

Output Format:

• feat: "Added X that does Y" (not just "add X feature")
• fix: "Fixed bug where X happened, now Y" (not just "fix X bug")
• refactor: "Changed X from A to B, now supports C" (not just "rename X")

Include:

• Layered Impact Matrix: rows for omo pure components, omo opencode, omo codex
• Layer-specific Version Recommendation: patch/minor/major per layer plus one overall release bump