ulw-loop

Use this skill when the user asks for ulw-loop, ulw, durable goal execution, evidence-led work, manual QA, or checkpointed long-running delivery.

This Codex skill is intentionally compact to avoid adding a large operating manual to an already-full conversation. The full workflow lives in references/full-workflow.md. Read only the sections needed for the current phase, then execute them exactly.

Required First Steps

1. Open references/full-workflow.md.
2. Read through Bootstrap, Execution Loop, and the Manual-QA channels table before running any ULW command or recording evidence.
3. If the task has code edits, tests, QA, or commit work, follow the full workflow's delegation and evidence rules. Tests alone never prove done.

Non-Negotiables

• Use the ulw-loop CLI state under .omo/ulw-loop; do not hand-edit goal state.
• Every success criterion needs observable evidence from a real channel: tmux, HTTP, browser, or computer-use.
• Record evidence through the CLI only after cleanup receipts are available.
• Delegate code edits, test writes, fixes, and QA execution to right-sized Codex subagents when the workflow requires it.
• Every spawn_agent message starts with TASK:, then names DELIVERABLE, SCOPE, and VERIFY; role selection requires agent_type, while model + reasoning_effort alone creates a default agent, not a reviewer or worker; prefer fork_turns: "none" unless full history is truly required.
• Plan and reviewer agents may run for a long time; spawn them in the background, keep doing independent root work, and poll with short wait_agent cycles. Never use a single long blocking wait for them.
• Avoid list_agents as a polling or status tool in large runs; it can replay large agent status and latest-message payloads. Track spawned agent names locally, use wait_agent for completion signals, targeted followups only when needed, and close_agent after integrating each result.
• Treat wait_agent as a mailbox signal, not proof of completion, content, or errors. After two waits with no substantive result, send one targeted followup, then record inconclusive and respawn a smaller fork_turns: "none" task if the child stays silent or ack-only.

Codex Tool Mapping

The full workflow may mention OpenCode-style orchestration examples. In Codex, translate them to native tools:

Workflow intent	Codex tool
Plan agent	spawn_agent(agent_type="plan", ...)
Search/read-only worker	spawn_agent(agent_type="explorer", ...)
Implementation or QA worker	spawn_agent(agent_type="worker", ...)
Final verification reviewer	spawn_agent(agent_type="codex-ultrawork-reviewer", ...)
Wait for background result	wait_agent(...)
Clean up finished worker	close_agent(...)

When translating load_skills=[...], include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's message.