Back to Oh My Openagent

Review-Work Final Report

.omo/evidence/20260630-private-discord-doctor-trust/review-work-final.md

4.14.12.2 KB
Original Source

Review-Work Final Report

PR: https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/pull/5767 Branch: code-yeongyu/fix-discord-private-doctor-trust Target: dev

Overall Verdict

PASSED after one evidence-hygiene fix loop.

Lanes

LaneVerdictConfidenceNotes
Goal and constraintsPASS after aggregate report addedHighDoctor behavior, scope, privacy, CI, and evidence path satisfy the original goal. Initial blocker was missing review-work coverage artifact, addressed by this report.
QA executionPASSHighRe-ran focused doctor test; inspected manual CLI QA and full-test summary. New guidance appeared on the real bun dist/cli/index.js doctor --platform opencode surface with isolated OpenCode/XDG dirs.
Code qualityPASS after fixHighSource/test diff is clean. Initial blocker was the 12,786-line full test log and RED summary wording; bun-test-full-v5.txt is now compact and SUMMARY.md distinguishes dependency RED from behavioral RED.
SecurityPASSLow residual severityNo blocking issues. Nonblocking hardening debt: pre-existing copied shell commands quote cache paths with double quotes, which handle spaces but not embedded shell substitution characters.
Context miningPASSHighSearched repo, git/GitHub history, docs, Bun command docs/help, and evidence patterns. No missed requirements found; committed evidence artifacts are normal for this repo when intentionally selected.

Verification Used For Final Candidate

  • git diff --check: exit 0 after the evidence hygiene fix.
  • bun test packages/omo-opencode/src/cli/doctor/checks/system.test.ts: 7 pass, 0 fail after the evidence hygiene fix.
  • Earlier accepted gates retained: bun run typecheck exit 0, full local bun test summary 10215 pass, 2 skip, 0 fail, GitHub CI pass across Linux/macOS/Windows, GitGuardian pass.

Blocking Issues

None remain.

Residuals

  • Cubic produced only a neutral/skipping check and no actionable GitHub review/comment body, so the Cubic gate is treated as skipped/no actionable review under the PR workflow.
  • The shell-quoting hardening note is nonblocking because the pattern pre-existed the PR and the changed package names are bounded to accepted OMO package names.