PR #5745 Security Code Review

Target: code-yeongyu/remove-codex-workflow-selector at 00eea45130acbdafb967e84c78d1f777389d287d

Verdict: PASS Security severity: NONE Recommendation: APPROVE codeQualityStatus: CLEAR

Scope Reviewed

• Diff against merge-base 0fff622367cf27706eca3c00ae36e930dfd86b6d.
• Deleted Codex workflow selector component and aggregate hook.
• Updated plugin manifest, package workspace, package lock, and aggregate tests.
• Evidence directory: .omo/evidence/20260629-remove-workflow-selector.
• GitHub PR page was checked and matched the local target commit.

Skill-Perspective Check

• omo:remove-ai-slops was loaded and applied as a review lens. No violation found: the test changes are not deletion-only false confidence; they pin the runtime/package absence of a removed prompt/transcript-reading hook.
• omo:programming plus the TypeScript reference README were loaded and applied as a review lens. No violation found: the diff removes a TypeScript component and does not add untyped escape hatches, needless abstractions, or new production parsing/validation.
• codex-security:security-diff-scan was consulted for the security review shape. Full Codex Security app/subagent workflow was not available in this harness, so this review used manual diff-scoped inspection and targeted local verification.

Findings

CRITICAL

None.

HIGH

None.

MEDIUM

None.

LOW

None.

Security Notes

• No hardcoded secrets or credential-like values were found in the changed production/test files or committed evidence. Regex hits were telemetry package/test names, placeholder auth/token test labels, temp paths, hashes, or expected test data.
• No hidden bidi/control characters were found in the changed diff or existing changed files.
• No stale runtime wiring remains for the removed selector. The manifest now lists only rules, ultrawork, and ulw-loop for UserPromptSubmit at packages/omo-codex/plugin/.codex-plugin/plugin.json:28.
• The package workspace and lockfile both removed components/workflow-selector; no workspace/link mismatch remains at packages/omo-codex/plugin/package.json:8 and packages/omo-codex/plugin/package-lock.json:10.
• The only remaining selector strings are a negative aggregate assertion and an ultrawork transcript regression fixture, not runtime wiring.
• The app-server evidence shows userPromptSubmit hooks fired for rules, ultrawork, and ulw-loop only, with no workflow selector hook in .omo/evidence/20260629-remove-workflow-selector/09-codex-app-server-drive-plugin.json:88.

Verification Performed

• git status --short --branch
• git rev-parse HEAD
• git diff --name-status 0fff622367cf27706eca3c00ae36e930dfd86b6d..HEAD
• Manifest/list consistency checks for hooks and workspaces with Node scripts.
• Runtime reference searches for workflow-selector, OMO_CODEX_AUTO_WORKFLOW, lazycodex-auto-workflow, and removed hook names.
• Secret-pattern scans over the diff and .omo/evidence/20260629-remove-workflow-selector.
• Bidi/control-character scan over the changed diff and existing changed files.
• git diff --check 0fff622367cf27706eca3c00ae36e930dfd86b6d..HEAD
• node --test packages/omo-codex/plugin/test/aggregate-hooks.test.mjs packages/omo-codex/plugin/test/aggregate-manifest.test.mjs packages/omo-codex/plugin/test/component-bundled-cli.test.mjs

Targeted test result: 23 passed, 0 failed.

Blockers

None.