docs/5.community/4.contribution.md
There is a range of different ways you might be able to contribute to the Nuxt ecosystem.
The Nuxt ecosystem includes many different projects and organizations:
nuxt-modules. While these modules have individual maintainers, they are not dependent on a single person.Check out the issues and discussions for the project you want to help. For example, here are the issues board and discussions for Nuxt. Helping other users, sharing workarounds, creating reproductions, or even poking into a bug a little bit and sharing your findings makes a huge difference.
Thank you for taking the time to create an issue! ❤️
Reporting bugs: Check out our guide for some things to do before opening an issue.
Feature requests: Check that there is not an existing issue or discussion covering the scope of the feature you have in mind. If the feature is to another part of the Nuxt ecosystem (such as a module), please consider raising a feature request there first. If the feature you have in mind is general or the API is not entirely clear, consider opening a discussion in the Ideas section to discuss with the community first.
We'll do our best to follow our internal issue decision making flowchart when responding to issues.
We always welcome pull requests! ❤️
Before you fix a bug, we recommend that you check whether there's an issue that describes it, as it's possible it's a documentation issue or that there is some context that would be helpful to know.
If you're working on a feature, then we ask that you open a feature request issue first to discuss with the maintainers whether the feature is desired - and the design of those features. This helps save time for both the maintainers and the contributors and means that features can be shipped faster. The issue should be confirmed by a framework team member before building out a feature in a pull request.
For typo fixes, it's recommended to batch multiple typo fixes into one pull request to maintain a cleaner commit history.
For bigger changes to Nuxt itself, we recommend that you first create a Nuxt module and implement the feature there. This allows for quick proof-of-concept. You can then create an RFC in the form of a discussion. As users adopt it and you gather feedback, it can then be refined and either added to Nuxt core or continue as a standalone module.
We use Conventional Commits for commit messages, which allows a changelog to be auto-generated based on the commits. Please read the guide through if you aren't familiar with it already.
Note that fix: and feat: are for actual code changes (that might affect logic). For typo or document changes, use docs: or chore: instead:
fix: typodocs: fix typoIf you are working in a project with a monorepo, like nuxt/nuxt, ensure that you specify the main scope of your commit in brackets. For example: feat(kit): add 'addMagicStuff' utility.
If you don't know how to send a pull request, we recommend reading the guide.
When sending a pull request, make sure your PR's title also follows the Commit Convention.
If your PR fixes or resolves existing issues, please make sure you mention them in the PR description.
It's ok to have multiple commits in a single PR; you don't need to rebase or force push for your changes as we will use Squash and Merge to squash the commits into one commit when merging.
We do not add any commit hooks to allow for quick commits. But before you make a pull request, you should ensure that any lint/test scripts are passing.
In general, please also make sure that there are no unrelated changes in a PR. For example, if your editor has made any changes to whitespace or formatting elsewhere in a file that you edited, please revert these so it is more obvious what your PR changes. And please avoid including multiple unrelated features or fixes in a single PR. If it is possible to separate them, it is better to have multiple PRs to review and merge separately. In general, a PR should do one thing only.
Once you've made a pull request, we'll do our best to review it promptly.
If we assign it to a maintainer, then that means that person will take special care to review it and implement any changes that may be required.
If we request changes on a PR, please ignore the red text! It doesn't mean we think it's a bad PR - it's just a way of easily telling the status of a list of pull requests at a glance.
If we mark a PR as 'pending', that means we likely have another task to do in reviewing the PR - it's an internal note-to-self, and not necessarily a reflection on whether the PR is a good idea or not. We will do our best to explain via a comment the reason for the pending status.
We'll do our best to follow our PR decision making flowchart when responding and reviewing to pull requests.
We welcome the thoughtful use of AI tools when contributing to Nuxt, yet ask all contributors to follow two core principles.
Our aim is ensuring quality and maintaining the joy of collaborating and communicating with real people. If you have ideas for improving our policy on AI in the Nuxt community, we'd love to hear them! ❤️
If you've built something with Nuxt that's cool, why not extract it into a module, so it can be shared with others? We have many excellent modules already, but there's always room for more.
If you need help while building it, feel free to check in with us.
We highly recommend creating a module first to test out big new features and gain community adoption.
If you have done this already, or it's not appropriate to create a new module, then please start by creating a new discussion. Make sure it explains your thinking as clearly as possible. Include code examples or function signatures for new APIs. Reference existing issues or pain points with examples.
If we think this should be an RFC, we'll change the category to RFC and broadcast it more widely for feedback.
An RFC will then move through the following stages:
rfc: active - currently open for commentrfc: approved - approved by the Nuxt teamrfc: ready to implement - an issue has been created and assigned to implementrfc: shipped - implementedrfc: archived - not approved, but archived for future referenceThe following conventions are required within the nuxt/ organization and recommended for other maintainers in the ecosystem.
Modules should follow the Nuxt module template. See module guide for more information.
unjs/ LibrariesWe recommend the following libraries which are used throughout the ecosystem:
path)type: moduleMost of the Nuxt ecosystem can consume ESM directly. In general we advocate that you avoid using CJS-specific code, such as __dirname and require statements. You can read more about ESM.
Corepack makes sure you are using the correct version for package manager when you run corresponding commands. Projects might have packageManager field in their package.json.
Under projects with configuration as shown below, Corepack will install v7.5.0 of pnpm (if you don't have it already) and use it to run your commands.
{
"packageManager": "[email protected]"
}
We use ESLint for both linting and formatting with @nuxt/eslint.
We recommend using VS Code along with the ESLint extension. If you would like, you can enable auto-fix and formatting when you save the code you are editing:
{
"editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
"source.fixAll": "never",
"source.fixAll.eslint": "explicit"
}
}
Since ESLint is already configured to format the code, there is no need to duplicate the functionality with Prettier. To format the code, you can run yarn lint --fix, pnpm lint --fix, bun run lint --fix, or deno run lint --fix or referring the ESLint section for IDE Setup.
If you have Prettier installed in your editor, we recommend you disable it when working on the project to avoid conflict.
We recommend pnpm as a package manager for modules, libraries and apps.
It is important to enable Corepack to ensure you are on the same version of the package manager as the project. Corepack is built-in to new node versions for seamless package manager integration.
To enable it, run
corepack enable
You only need to do this one time, after Node.js is installed on your computer.
Documentation is an essential part of Nuxt. We aim to be an intuitive framework - and a big part of that is making sure that both the developer experience and the docs are perfect across the ecosystem. 👌
Here are some tips that may help improve your documentation:
Use American English spelling (behavior rather than behaviour, customize rather than customise).
Write tool and project names using their official capitalization, even when the npm package name is lowercase (for example, PostCSS rather than postcss, Vite rather than vite, ESLint rather than eslint). Use the lowercase npm package name in backticks only when referring to the package itself, such as in installation instructions.
::caution{icon="i-lucide-circle-x"} Nuxt supports postcss out of the box. ::
::tip{icon="i-lucide-circle-check"}
Nuxt supports PostCSS out of the box. You don't need to install postcss manually.
::
::note
Casing of common tool names is checked automatically by case police when you run pnpm lint:docs.
::
Capitalize headings following Chicago title case. In short: capitalize the first word, the last word, and all major words (nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns); lowercase articles, coordinating conjunctions, and prepositions regardless of length (for example, a, and, or, with, from, and to). When in doubt, capitalizemytitle.com can help.
::caution{icon="i-lucide-circle-x"} How to contribute to the docs ::
::tip{icon="i-lucide-circle-check"} How to Contribute to the Docs ::
Code in headings keeps its original casing and is not counted for capitalization purposes (for example, Using useFetch in Components).
Wrap the following in backticks so they render as inline code:
nuxt.config.ts, server/api/@nuxt/kit, postcssssr: false, the css optionuseFetch, <NuxtLink>, defineNuxtConfignpx nuxt initDo not use backticks for names of tools, projects, or general concepts (use Vite, not vite, when referring to the tool).
Add a filename to code blocks so readers know where the code belongs. If the code doesn't belong in a particular file (for example, a shell command), use a descriptive label like [Terminal].
```ts [nuxt.config.ts]
export default defineNuxtConfig({
ssr: false,
})
```
Make examples copy-pasteable. Include the necessary imports and avoid placeholders such as ... in the middle of code that a reader would paste into their project. A reader should be able to copy an example into their project and have it work with minimal changes.
When linking to other documentation pages, use relative paths without the domain: /docs/4.x/getting-started/installation rather than https://nuxt.com/docs/4.x/getting-started/installation.
When linking to external resources, link to the final URL rather than one that redirects. You can check with:
curl -sILo /dev/null -w '%{http_code} %{url_effective}\n' https://example.com/some-page
This follows any chain of redirects and prints the final status and URL. A 200 status with the URL you requested means the link is fine. If the final URL differs, link to that instead.
We aim for a tone that is friendly and professional. Write directly to the reader ("you"), be concise, and assume good faith: readers come from many different backgrounds and levels of experience, so avoid language that could make anyone feel talked down to. It's fine to be warm - the docs can have personality - but clarity always comes first.
Avoid subjective words like simply, just, obviously... when possible.
Keep in mind your readers can have different backgrounds and experiences. Therefore, these words don't convey meaning and can be harmful.
::caution{ icon="i-lucide-circle-x"} Simply make sure the function returns a promise. ::
::tip{icon="i-lucide-circle-check"} Make sure the function returns a promise. ::
Prefer active voice.
::caution{icon="i-lucide-circle-x"} An error will be thrown by Nuxt. ::
::tip{icon="i-lucide-circle-check"} Nuxt will throw an error. ::
Use consistent section names and ordering when documenting API pages, including composables, utilities, and components. Include only the sections that apply:
Use these exact section names. For example, use Parameters rather than Params and Example rather than Examples.
When documenting API pages (composables, utils, components), add the minimal Nuxt version when a feature or utility was introduced, so readers know which version they need.
Use two levels:
minimalVersion: "3.9" in the frontmatter (without the "v" prefix). The docs layout renders the version badge automatically from this field, displaying it as vX.Y (e.g. v3.9, v3.15).:badge[v3.8]{color="info" size="xs" class="align-middle"} (e.g. for getCachedData in useFetch, or for the navigation mode in callOnce).To find the version, check @since in JSDoc in the source, the release notes, or the Nuxt blog.
::read-more{to="/docs/4.x/community/framework-contribution#documentation-guide"} Learn how to contribute to the documentation. ::