.agents/skills/sandbox-bench/SKILL.md
Measures what a change is actually worth, end to end: two revisions
("arms") built into otherwise-identical Next.js apps, exercised by the
bench/render-pipeline harness on Vercel Sandbox VMs, compared with
paired statistics that treat the VM boot as the unit of replication.
All heavy work happens on sandbox VMs; the laptop only orchestrates.
Scripts live in scripts/ next to this file and run from anywhere.
Arms are git refs, resolved in cached clones of react and next.js;
the Next side defaults to canary. Everything is cached
content-addressed: first use of a new pair builds caches (~45-60 min
extra, once); later runs boot straight into measurement.
node scripts/config.mjs show — if it reports NOT CONFIGURED, ask
the user which Vercel team and project the sandbox VMs
should run under (these are billed resources; never guess, never
default), then node scripts/config.mjs set team=<slug> project=<name>.
Config lives in ~/.config/sandbox-bench/config.json — never commit
team/project names into the repo.vercel whoami --scope <team-slug> plus one scoped
read call (e.g. vercel sandbox ls) — grants drop and recover on
their own, and a transient 403 needs no login at all. If
verification still fails, run vercel login <team-slug> yourself
as a background task (the token lives with the CLI session, not
with the user). It opens a browser/device confirmation — relay the
URL if one is printed — but keep re-running the verification pair
every minute or two while it waits: access often returns before
the login flow reports success, and once verification passes, kill
the pending login and resume. After a 403 outage, expect in-flight runs to have died:
run node scripts/bench-status.mjs and follow its recovery
actions (measurement VMs will have hit their ~5h timeout if the
outage was long — those cells need relaunching, not collecting).reactRepo/nextRepo in the config at existing checkouts).Before the first real run with a new configuration, sanity-check the
plan with --dry-run (prints what would happen, touches nothing).
--pr <url|number> — base is computed automatically
(merge-base of the PR head with react main).--arms base=<ref>,cand=<ref> — base FIRST. For a
multi-commit branch, base is the merge-base with main, not cand^.--next-pr <url|number>. The React side defaults to
whatever each Next ref vendors (that's what would ship); pass
--react-ref only to pin both arms to one specific React build.--next-arms base=<ref>,cand=<ref>.Exactly one side varies; the other is identical in both arms. That isolation is what makes the numbers attributable — never vary both.
A bench number from an arm that fails its own tests is meaningless. For any arm that is not already CI-green upstream (hand-assembled branches, cherry-picks with resolved conflicts, local commits):
node scripts/sandbox-gate.mjs --arms cand=<ref>
The bench itself enforces the primary gate: every react arm's commit must have green CI on the react repo, checked automatically before any build or VM is spent. PRs and main-history commits normally satisfy this with no extra work. For local or unpushed refs (no CI exists), gate on a VM with sandbox-gate.mjs and then pass --allow-ungated to the bench. The VM gate runs the full test suite in prod mode (the channel that gets benched). PASS requires seeing the actual test counts in the output. If a gate fails, report the failures and stop — do not bench a broken arm. Each arm is gated in its own lockfile's environment. Bench the exact sha the gate prints (a branch ref can move between gate and bench).
bash -c 'node scripts/sandbox-e2e.mjs --pr <url> --label <slug> \
2>&1 | grep --line-buffered -v "^live "; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]}'
For React PRs, launch BOTH suites (separate background tasks; they share arm builds and caches):
bash -c 'node scripts/sandbox-ssr.mjs --pr <url> --label <slug>-ssr \
2>&1 | grep --line-buffered -v "^live "; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]}'
The e2e suite measures the Node path through a real Next.js app; the ssr suite measures the react repo's flight-ssr-bench fixture — 8 variants (Fizz and Flight+Fizz, Node and Edge web streams, sync and async), each sequentially with Flight script injection and behind an HTTP server at c=1/c=10. Edge cells are the ssr suite's headline (the e2e suite cannot see that path); its Node and Fizz-only cells attribute an effect to the Flight layer, the Fizz layer, or the stream plumbing. The fixture (the workload) is pinned to one ref for both arms — react main by default — so only the React builds differ; if the PR itself edits the fixture, the launcher says so and the run does not measure those edits. Next PRs run the e2e suite only.
live ... lines are streaming estimates for progress display only.
Never stop a run early because a live p-value looks good, and never
report a live number — sequential peeking manufactures false
positives. Only the final analysis counts.canary, is the latest published canary
release (the launcher prints its version and sha), so repeat benches
reuse the built snapshot until a new canary ships.--bench-env KEY=VALUE (runtime-only env for the
bench process — it does NOT affect the snapshot's app build), --isolate-routes
(tail investigations), --no-profile (skip the CPU capture that
runs by default after the timed runs), --prepare (build caches
only — use when two cells will share an arm, to avoid duplicate
builds racing).<runDir>/prof-vm<N>/
as standard V8 .cpuprofile files. Cross-VM profile diffs are
highly stable (observed 16/16 sign agreement on real movers), so one
profiled cell suffices to rank hot paths. Analysis caveats:
aggregate by (functionName, line, column) — bare minified names
collide across the bundle — and never diff arms by minified name
(the minifier renames between builds); match positions or code
snippets instead.__NEXT_USE_NODE_STREAMS is inlined as true for the node runtime
at build time). React changes that only touch the EDGE stream
configs are not exercised end-to-end and will (correctly) bench as
no detected difference.The goal is the truth about the change, not making its author feel good. The final analysis prints, per route/phase/metric, the boot-level mean, ±95% CI, and p across boots. Apply the policy in references/methodology.md:
within-run p shown in brackets is a diagnostic, never a claim.Re-analyze any past run without re-running it:
node scripts/bench-analyze.mjs <runDir>.
Name what was measured with links: the PR title (printed in the analysis header, stored in meta.json) linking to the PR; for ref arms, the commit title. Lead with a table of the significant cells, each row carrying the effect with its unit, the CI, and p:
## [<PR title>](<PR url>) — e2e, Vercel Sandbox (x86 Xeon), <n> boots
Significant (boot-level p < 0.01, A/A-validated):
| cell | effect | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| /dashboard under load | +14.4% throughput (req/s) | ±3.2% | <0.0001 |
| /dashboard serial | −10.7% median latency (ms) | ±0.6% | <0.0001 |
No detected difference: <every cell not in the table, by name>.
Flags: <cells at 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, sign disagreements across boots,
fingerprint caveats, anything that does not add up>
One row per cell: rps and median restate each other, so report the throughput number (add a p95 row only when the tail moves differently from the median). Document metrics (raw/gzip/Flight KB) get their own rows when they differ — they are the mechanism evidence. When the Next side predates the document-metrics harness (vercel/next.js#95828) those cells are absent; say so instead of silently reporting less. State the platform next to the numbers. Magnitudes are platform-dependent (GC share differs by CPU); direction and mechanism transfer, percentages do not. Never present a noise-compatible delta as a small win or loss — it is "no detected difference".
Every collected run lands in one SQLite file,
~/.cache/sandbox-bench/results.db — raw measurements and artifacts
(CPU profiles, logs) only, written exclusively by the importer, never
by hand. The launcher imports and verifies automatically at
collection; bench-analyze reads the db and nothing else, so every
statistic is a pure function of it. Numbers in reports come from the
analysis output verbatim — never retype, recompute, or aggregate them
yourself.
node scripts/bench-db.mjs ls — all runs with sample/artifact counts.node scripts/bench-db.mjs verify [runId] — integrity checks:
sqlite-level, referential, one fingerprint per arm, paired sample
counts, artifact sha256. Run it before drawing on old data.node scripts/bench-db.mjs export out.db <runId...> — cut a
self-contained db of specific runs (with their profiles) to send to
someone. It opens in any SQLite tool.node scripts/bench-analyze.mjs <runId> — re-analyze anything in
the db; a run-dir argument imports it first.The launcher narrates itself on stdout: launch facts first (run dir,
arms, CI verdicts), then a progress line every ~2 minutes with rows
collected and interim per-route effects with confidence. Relay to the
user: the run dir and expected duration right after launching,
notable interim shifts if they ask how it's going, and the full
verdict from the final analysis when the completion notification
arrives. The analysis names metrics that were not captured on this run — repeat that in the verdict when it limits what the data can
say (document metrics absent means the payload mechanism is
unverified, not verified-identical).
While a run is active, open any reply with a one-line status per run: read the tail of the launcher's output and quote its latest progress line. If the session supports timed wakeups or reminders, schedule a check at each expected transition (arm builds -> experiment snapshot -> measuring, then every ~15 minutes of measurement) and post the progress line; if not, say when the next update will arrive so silence is never ambiguous. Interim effects in progress lines are streaming estimates — share them as progress, never as claims.
If a launcher process dies (session teardown, crash), the remote VMs
keep executing their measurement loops — the data is not lost. node scripts/bench-collect.mjs <runDir> reconnects, waits for the loops,
downloads the results, cleans up, and analyzes. Run it before the VMs
hit their ~5h timeout.
node scripts/bench-status.mjs. Session
restarts silently kill background launchers while their detached VMs
keep measuring, and a dead launcher's log still ends with a
healthy-looking progress line — never infer liveness from log tails
or task output files. bench-status checks each run's recorded
launcher pid and prints the per-run recovery action (running /
collect now / relaunch). Run it at the start of any session that
expects work in flight, after any crash, and before telling the user
what is or isn't running. Launcher crashes are also recorded in the
run's status.json (phase: "failed" plus the error).vercel sandbox list (with the configured team/project) to find
them; poll each VM's /vercel/sandbox/loop.done, cp its
results.jsonl down when done, then remove the VM and analyze with
bench-analyze.mjs.node scripts/sandbox-sweep.mjs
lists this skill's VMs (matched by sbench-* name AND the
purpose=sandbox-bench tag, and only when older than --min-age-hours,
default 3, so healthy in-flight runs are never touched); --yes
removes them by exact listed name.--prepare
first instead.Per cell at defaults: ~18 VMs (8 measurement + build/snapshot VMs), ~1-2h wall-clock cold, ~30-60 min warm. A/A calibration and confirmation runs are extra cells. VMs are billed to the configured team — for anything beyond a single PR check, confirm scope first.