Back to Linux

Guidelines

Documentation/gpu/nova/guidelines.rst

7.02.5 KB
Original Source

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)

========== Guidelines

This document describes the general project guidelines that apply to nova-core and nova-drm.

Language

The Nova project uses the Rust programming language. In this context, all rules of the Rust for Linux project as documented in :doc:../../rust/general-information apply. Additionally, the following rules apply.

  • Unless technically necessary otherwise (e.g. uAPI), any driver code is written in Rust.

  • Unless technically necessary, unsafe Rust code must be avoided. In case of technical necessity, unsafe code should be isolated in a separate component providing a safe API for other driver code to use.

Style

All rules of the Rust for Linux project as documented in :doc:../../rust/coding-guidelines apply.

For a submit checklist, please also see the Rust for Linux Submit checklist addendum <https://rust-for-linux.com/contributing#submit-checklist-addendum>_.

Documentation

The availability of proper documentation is essential in terms of scalability, accessibility for new contributors and maintainability of a project in general, but especially for a driver running as complex hardware as Nova is targeting.

Hence, adding documentation of any kind is very much encouraged by the project.

Besides that, there are some minimum requirements.

  • Every non-private structure needs at least a brief doc comment explaining the semantical sense of the structure, as well as potential locking and lifetime requirements. It is encouraged to have the same minimum documentation for non-trivial private structures.

  • uAPIs must be fully documented with kernel-doc comments; additionally, the semantical behavior must be explained including potential special or corner cases.

  • The APIs connecting the 1st level driver (nova-core) with 2nd level drivers must be fully documented. This includes doc comments, potential locking and lifetime requirements, as well as example code if applicable.

  • Abbreviations must be explained when introduced; terminology must be uniquely defined.

  • Register addresses, layouts, shift values and masks must be defined properly; unless obvious, the semantical sense must be documented. This only applies if the author is able to obtain the corresponding information.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Patches must only be applied if reviewed by at least one other person on the mailing list; this also applies for maintainers.