ContextQMD
Back to Htop

AI-Assisted Contributions Policy for htop

docs/ai-contributions-policy.md

3.5.12.3 KB
Original Source

AI-Assisted Contributions Policy for htop

v1.0, 2026-02-18

  1. You MAY use AI assistance for contributing to htop, as long as you follow the principles described below.

  2. Accountability:

    You MUST take the responsibility for your contribution.

    Contributing to htop means vouching for the quality, license compliance, and utility of your submission.

    All contributions, whether from a human author or assisted by large language models (LLMs) or other generative AI tools, must meet the project’s standards for inclusion.

    The contributor is always the author and is fully accountable for the entirety of these contributions.

  3. Transparency:

    You MUST disclose the use of AI tools when the significant part of the contribution is taken from a tool without changes.

    You SHOULD disclose the other uses of AI tools, where it might be useful.

    Routine use of assistive tools for correcting grammar and spelling, or for clarifying language, does not require disclosure.

    • Disclosures are made where authorship is normally indicated. For contributions tracked in git, the recommended method is an Assisted-by: commit message trailer.

    • Examples:

      • Assisted-by: generic LLM chatbot

      • Assisted-by: ChatGPTv5

    For contributions outside git commits, disclosure may include document preambles, design file metadata or Assisted-by: lines on issues.

  4. Contribution Evaluation:

    AI tools may be used to assist human reviewers by providing analysis and suggestions.

    You MUST NOT use AI as the sole or final arbiter in making a substantive or subjective judgment on a contribution.

    This does not prohibit the use of automated tooling for objective technical validation, such as CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or spam filtering.

    The final accountability for accepting a contribution, even if implemented by an automated system, always rests with the human contributor who authorizes the action.

This policy has been adapted for htop use from the Fedora policy v1.0 published at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/policy/ai-contribution-policy/.

The key words “MAY”, “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, and “SHOULD” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.