Eval Review

Use after /gsd-execute-phase to verify that the evaluation strategy from AI-SPEC.md was actually implemented. Mirrors the pattern of /gsd-ui-review and /gsd-validate-phase. </purpose>

<required_reading> @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ai-evals.md </required_reading>

0. Initialize

INIT=$(gsd-sdk query init.phase-op "${PHASE_ARG}")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi

Parse: phase_dir, phase_number, phase_name, phase_slug, padded_phase, commit_docs.

AUDITOR_MODEL=$(gsd-sdk query resolve-model gsd-eval-auditor 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.model' 2>/dev/null || true)

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► EVAL AUDIT — PHASE {N}: {name}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

1. Detect Input State

SUMMARY_FILES=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null)
AI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-AI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
EVAL_REVIEW_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-EVAL-REVIEW.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)

State A — AI-SPEC.md + SUMMARY.md exist: Full audit against spec State B — SUMMARY.md exists, no AI-SPEC.md: Audit against general best practices State C — No SUMMARY.md: Exit — "Phase {N} not executed. Run /gsd-execute-phase {N} first."

Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available. If EVAL_REVIEW_FILE non-empty: Use AskUserQuestion:

• header: "Existing Eval Review"
• question: "EVAL-REVIEW.md already exists for Phase {N}."
• options:
  • "Re-audit — run fresh audit"
  • "View — display current review and exit"

If "View": display file, exit. If "Re-audit": continue.

If State B (no AI-SPEC.md): Warn:

No AI-SPEC.md found for Phase {N}.
Audit will evaluate against general AI eval best practices rather than a phase-specific plan.
Consider running /gsd-ai-integration-phase {N} before implementation next time.

Continue (non-blocking).

2. Gather Context Paths

Build file list for auditor:

• AI-SPEC.md (if exists — the planned eval strategy)
• All SUMMARY.md files in phase dir
• All PLAN.md files in phase dir

3. Spawn gsd-eval-auditor

◆ Spawning eval auditor...

Build prompt:

Read ~/.claude/agents/gsd-eval-auditor.md for instructions.

<objective>
Conduct evaluation coverage audit of Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
{If AI-SPEC exists: "Audit against AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan."}
{If no AI-SPEC: "Audit against general AI eval best practices."}
</objective>

<files_to_read>
- {summary_paths}
- {plan_paths}
- {ai_spec_path if exists}
</files_to_read>

<input>
ai_spec_path: {ai_spec_path or "none"}
phase_dir: {phase_dir}
phase_number: {phase_number}
phase_name: {phase_name}
padded_phase: {padded_phase}
state: {A or B}
</input>

Spawn as Task with model AUDITOR_MODEL.

4. Parse Auditor Result

Read the written EVAL-REVIEW.md. Extract:

• overall_score
• verdict (PRODUCTION READY | NEEDS WORK | SIGNIFICANT GAPS | NOT IMPLEMENTED)
• critical_gap_count

5. Display Summary

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► EVAL AUDIT COMPLETE — PHASE {N}: {name}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Score: {overall_score}/100
◆ Verdict: {verdict}
◆ Critical Gaps: {critical_gap_count}
◆ Output: {eval_review_path}

{If PRODUCTION READY:}
  Next step: /gsd-plan-phase (next phase) or deploy

{If NEEDS WORK:}
  Address critical gaps in EVAL-REVIEW.md, then re-run /gsd-eval-review {N}

{If SIGNIFICANT GAPS or NOT IMPLEMENTED:}
  Review AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan. Critical eval dimensions are not implemented.
  Do not deploy until gaps are addressed.

6. Commit

If commit_docs is true:

git add "${EVAL_REVIEW_FILE}"
git commit -m "docs({phase_slug}): add EVAL-REVIEW.md — score {overall_score}/100 ({verdict})"

<success_criteria>

• Phase execution state detected correctly
• AI-SPEC.md presence handled (with or without)
• gsd-eval-auditor spawned with correct context
• EVAL-REVIEW.md written (by auditor)
• Score and verdict displayed to user
• Appropriate next steps surfaced based on verdict
• Committed if commit_docs enabled </success_criteria>