Back to Etcd

PR management

Documentation/contributor-guide/triage_prs.md

3.7.02.7 KB
Original Source

PR management

Purpose

Speed up PR management.

The etcd PRs are listed at https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pulls A PR can have various labels, milestones, reviewers, etc. The detailed list of labels can be found at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels

Following are a few example searches on PR for convenience:

Scope

These guidelines serve as a primary document for managing PRs and review policy in etcd. Everyone is welcome to help manage PRs but the work and responsibilities discussed in this document are created with etcd maintainers and active contributors in mind.

Ensure tests are run

The etcd project use Kubernetes Prow and GitHub Actions to run tests. To ensure all required tests run if a pull request is ready for testing and still has the needs-ok-to-test label then please comment on the pull request /ok-to-test.

Handle inactive PRs

Poke PR owner if review comments are not addressed in 15 days. If the PR owner does not reply in 90 days, update the PR with a new commit if possible. If not, inactive PR should be closed after 180 days.

Poke reviewer if needed

Reviewers are responsive in a timely fashion, but considering everyone is busy, give them some time after requesting a review if a quick response is not provided. If the response is not provided in 10 days, feel free to contact them via adding a comment in the PR or sending an email or message on Slack.

Verify important labels are in place

Make sure that appropriate reviewers are added to the PR. Also, make sure that a milestone is identified. If any of these or other important labels are missing, add them. If a correct label cannot be decided, leave a comment for the maintainers to do so as needed.

Review policy

To ensure code quality and shared ownership, this review policy applies to all pull requests (PRs).

Default rule

PRs should get at least two approvals (/lgtm or GitHub review approval) before merging.

Notes:

  • Approvals should come from a maintainer, reviewer, or submodule owner familiar with the relevant code or area.
  • If there’s disagreement, maintainers should discuss and agree before merging.

Exceptions for Less Impactful PRs

For low-risk changes — such as:

  • CI workflows
  • Documentation
  • Comments

The rule can be relaxed:

  • One approval is generally enough.

However:

  • If the author is a maintainer, they should still get approval from another maintainer, reviewer, or submodule owner, even for minor changes.