Back to Deer Flow

{TITLE}

skills/public/github-deep-research/assets/report_template.md

latest3.5 KB
Original Source

[!NOTE] Generate this report in user's own language.

{TITLE}

  • Research Date: {DATE}
  • Timestamp: {TIMESTAMP}
  • Confidence Level: {CONFIDENCE_LEVEL}
  • Subject: {SUBJECT_DESCRIPTION}

Repository Information

  • Name: {REPOSITORY_NAME}
  • Description: {REPOSITORY_DESCRIPTION}
  • URL: {REPOSITORY_URL}
  • Stars: {REPOSITORY_STARS}
  • Forks: {REPOSITORY_FORKS}
  • Open Issues: {REPOSITORY_OPEN_ISSUES}
  • Language(s): {REPOSITORY_LANGUAGES}
  • License: {REPOSITORY_LICENSE}
  • Created At: {REPOSITORY_CREATED_AT}
  • Updated At: {REPOSITORY_UPDATED_AT}
  • Pushed At: {REPOSITORY_PUSHED_AT}
  • Topics: {REPOSITORY_TOPICS}

Executive Summary

{EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY}

IMPORTANT: Include inline citations using [citation:Title](URL) format after each claim. Example: "The project gained 10k stars in 3 months citation:GitHub Stats."


Complete Chronological Timeline

PHASE 1: {PHASE_1_NAME}

{PHASE_1_PERIOD}

{PHASE_1_CONTENT}

PHASE 2: {PHASE_2_NAME}

{PHASE_2_PERIOD}

{PHASE_2_CONTENT}

PHASE 3: {PHASE_3_NAME}

{PHASE_3_PERIOD}

{PHASE_3_CONTENT}


Key Analysis

IMPORTANT: Support each analysis point with inline citations [citation:Title](URL).

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_1_TITLE}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_1_CONTENT}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_2_TITLE}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_2_CONTENT}


Architecture / System Overview

mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
    B --> C[Component C]
    C --> D[Component D]

{ARCHITECTURE_DESCRIPTION}


Metrics & Impact Analysis

Growth Trajectory

{METRICS_TIMELINE}

Key Metrics

MetricValueAssessment
{METRIC_1}{VALUE_1}{ASSESSMENT_1}
{METRIC_2}{VALUE_2}{ASSESSMENT_2}
{METRIC_3}{VALUE_3}{ASSESSMENT_3}

Comparative Analysis

Feature Comparison

Feature{SUBJECT}{COMPETITOR_1}{COMPETITOR_2}
{FEATURE_1}{SUBJ_F1}{COMP1_F1}{COMP2_F1}
{FEATURE_2}{SUBJ_F2}{COMP1_F2}{COMP2_F2}
{FEATURE_3}{SUBJ_F3}{COMP1_F3}{COMP2_F3}

Market Positioning

{MARKET_POSITIONING}


Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

{STRENGTHS}

Areas for Improvement

{WEAKNESSES}


Key Success Factors

{SUCCESS_FACTORS}


Sources

Primary Sources

{PRIMARY_SOURCES}

Media Coverage

{MEDIA_SOURCES}

Academic / Technical Sources

{ACADEMIC_SOURCES}

Community Sources

{COMMUNITY_SOURCES}


Confidence Assessment

High Confidence (90%+) Claims: {HIGH_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}

Medium Confidence (70-89%) Claims: {MEDIUM_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}

Lower Confidence (50-69%) Claims: {LOW_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}


Research Methodology

This report was compiled using:

  1. Multi-source web search - Broad discovery and targeted queries
  2. GitHub repository analysis - Commits, issues, PRs, activity metrics
  3. Content extraction - Official docs, technical articles, media coverage
  4. Cross-referencing - Verification across independent sources
  5. Chronological reconstruction - Timeline from timestamped data
  6. Confidence scoring - Claims weighted by source reliability

Research Depth: {RESEARCH_DEPTH} Time Scope: {TIME_SCOPE} Geographic Scope: {GEOGRAPHIC_SCOPE}


Report Prepared By: Github Deep Research by DeerFlow Date: {REPORT_DATE} Report Version: 1.0 Status: Complete