Evaluation/HumanEval/README.md
We provide a test script to evaluate the performance of the deepseek-coder model on code generation benchmarks. We select the widely-used benchmarks: HumanEval-Python, HumanEval-Multilingual.
pip install accelerate
pip install attrdict
pip install transformers
pip install pytorch
We've created a sample script, eval.sh, that demonstrates how to test the DeepSeek-Coder-1.3b-Base model on the HumanEval dataset leveraging 8 GPUs. If your use case involves a different model or dataset, simply adjust the script to fit your needs.
Additionally, for various programming languages, the execution path may differ. Please ensure you update the appropriate paths in the humaneval/execution.py file accordingly.
MODEL_NAME_OR_PATH="deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-1.3b-base"
DATASET_ROOT="data/"
LANGUAGE="python"
python -m accelerate.commands.launch --config_file test_config.yaml eval_pal.py --logdir ${MODEL_NAME_OR_PATH} --language ${LANGUAGE} --dataroot ${DATASET_ROOT}
To evaluate the instruction-based model, please follow the script below:
LANG="python"
OUPUT_DIR="output"
MODEL="deepseek-coder-33b-instruct"
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1 python eval_instruct.py \
--model "deepseek-ai/$MODEL" \
--output_path "$OUPUT_DIR/${LANG}.$MODEL.jsonl" \
--language $LANG \
--temp_dir $OUPUT_DIR
We report experimental results here for 8 main-stream programming languages, python, c++, java, PHP, TypeScript, C#, Bash, and JavaScript. For all open-source models, we utilize this repository to obtain the performance of the models on the HumanEval dataset. We set the maximum input length to 4096 and the maximum output length to 500, and employ the greedy search strategy.
| Model | Size | Python | C++ | Java | PHP | TS | C# | Bash | JS | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-cushman-001 | 12B | 33.5% | 31.9% | 30.6% | 28.9% | 31.3% | 22.1% | 11.7% | - | - |
| CodeShell | 7B | 35.4% | 32.9% | 34.2% | 31.7% | 30.2% | 38.0% | 7.0% | 33.5% | 30.4% |
| CodeGeeX2 | 6B | 36.0% | 29.2% | 25.9% | 23.6% | 20.8% | 29.7% | 6.3% | 24.8% | 24.5% |
| StarCoderBase | 16B | 31.7% | 31.1% | 28.5% | 25.4% | 34.0% | 34.8% | 8.9% | 29.8% | 28.0% |
| CodeLLama | 7B | 31.7% | 29.8% | 34.2% | 23.6% | 36.5% | 36.7% | 12.0% | 29.2% | 29.2% |
| CodeLLama | 13B | 36.0% | 37.9% | 38.0% | 34.2% | 45.2% | 43.0% | 16.5% | 32.3% | 35.4% |
| CodeLLama | 34B | 48.2% | 44.7% | 44.9% | 41.0% | 42.1% | 48.7% | 15.8% | 42.2% | 41.0% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Base | 1.3B | 34.8% | 31.1% | 32.3% | 24.2% | 28.9% | 36.7% | 10.1% | 28.6% | 28.3% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Base | 5.7B | 48.7% | 45.3% | 41.1% | 39.7% | 44.7% | 41.1% | 27.8% | 42.2% | 41.3% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Base | 6.7B | 49.4% | 50.3% | 43.0% | 38.5% | 49.7% | 50.0% | 28.5% | 48.4% | 44.7% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Base | 33B | 56.1% | 58.4% | 51.9% | 44.1% | 52.8% | 51.3% | 32.3% | 55.3% | 50.3% |
| Model | Size | Python | C++ | Java | PHP | TS | C# | Bash | JS | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo | - | 76.2% | 63.4% | 69.2% | 60.9% | 69.1% | 70.8% | 42.4% | 67.1% | 64.9% |
| GPT-4 | - | 84.1% | 76.4% | 81.6% | 77.2% | 77.4% | 79.1% | 58.2% | 78.0% | 76.5% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Instruct | 1.3B | 65.2% | 45.3% | 51.9% | 45.3% | 59.7% | 55.1% | 12.7% | 52.2% | 48.4% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Instruct | 6.7B | 78.9% | 63.4% | 68.4% | 68.9% | 67.2% | 72.8% | 36.7% | 72.7% | 66.1% |
| DeepSeek-Coder-Instruct | 33B | 79.3% | 68.9% | 73.4% | 72.7% | 67.9% | 74.1% | 43.0% | 73.9% | 69.2% |