.agents/skills/perf-compare-cudf/SKILL.md
Use this skill when the user asks to compare libcudf benchmark performance for:
rapidsai/cudf main.rapidsai/cudf main.Run the same selected libcudf NVBench benchmarks on the target (current WIP or cudf PR) and then on rapidsai/cudf main, then report meaningful differences.
<cudf-remote> is the git remote for https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf (often upstream). Detect it with git remote -v.
gh CLI authenticated — run gh auth status. If not authenticated, guide the user to run:
gh auth login
repo scope. Do not run gh auth token from within the agent.coder). If not, stop and ask the user for instructions.git status --short, and the exact target (current WIP or cudf PR).main.ts = <YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS>mkdir -p benchmark_compare/<ts>/{target,main}
For current-branch or WIP targets: keep target changes applied for the target run.
For PR targets: Stash any unrelated local changes, record the stash name, and check out the PR:
gh pr checkout <PR_NUMBER> --repo rapidsai/cudf
For PR targets: After switching, check if the PR branch is behind <cudf-remote>/main and add a merge commit. DO NOT push anything. If there are merge conflicts, stop and guide the user to fix them.
On the first build for a checkout, force CMake reconfiguration to enable benchmarks:
configure-cudf-cpp -DBUILD_BENCHMARKS=ON
build-cudf-cpp
configure-cudf-cpp -DBUILD_BENCHMARKS=ON if the build directory is cleaned or CMake options may have changed.build-test-cudf skill for instructions and troubleshooting.git fetch <cudf-remote> main.git diff --name-only <cudf-remote>/main...HEAD
cpp/build/latest/benchmarks/*_NVBENCH.cpp/build/latest/benchmarks/<BENCH> --list
cpp/build/latest/benchmarks/<BENCH> --help-axes
-b and -a options. Reuse them unchanged on both branches.nvidia-smi. Do this every time before running anything (target or main run); if the same GPU is no longer idle, pick another one, wait, or ask before continuing.CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=<idx> and -d 0.benchmark_compare/<ts>/target/, for example:
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=<idx> cpp/build/latest/benchmarks/<BENCH> -d 0 \
-b <bench_name> -a <axis=...> ... \
--json benchmark_compare/<ts>/target/<BENCH>.json 2>&1 | tee benchmark_compare/<ts>/target/<BENCH>.log
git fetch <cudf-remote> main
git checkout -B _bench_main <cudf-remote>/main
_bench_main.Follow configure, build and benchmark run steps as for the target. Run the same set of benchmarks chosen above, but write JSON and log files to benchmark_compare/<ts>/main/ instead.
Use NVBench's comparison script from the build tree:
NVBENCH_SCRIPTS=cpp/build/latest/_deps/nvbench-src/python/scripts
test -f "$NVBENCH_SCRIPTS/nvbench_compare.py" || \
NVBENCH_SCRIPTS=cpp/build/latest/_deps/nvbench-src/scripts
PYTHONPATH="$NVBENCH_SCRIPTS" python "$NVBENCH_SCRIPTS/nvbench_compare.py" \
--threshold-diff 0.05 --no-color benchmark_compare/<ts>/main benchmark_compare/<ts>/target \
| tee benchmark_compare/<ts>/COMPARISON.md
main), the second is the comparison (target). Re-run surprising failures once, especially small or noisy configs.Return to the starting branch/state, pop any stash you created, delete temporary branches, and confirm git status matches the starting state.
Remember to note if there were any end-of-suite segfaults or config throws and if the behavior was the same on both branches.
Use the below template for COMPARISON.md, adapting the metric columns to the benchmark. GPU time is always useful, but other metrics such as output file size, throughput, compression ratio, or memory usage are also of interest when they change significantly in target vs main.
Summarize chat with the headline result (regression, improvement, or within noise), relevant metrics, hardware used, branch SHAs, axis coverage, the summary table from the template, and generated files.
# Benchmark Comparison: <cudf-remote>/main vs target (`WIP` or `PR`)
- Primary metric(s): <GPU time, throughput, output size, memory, etc.>
- Δ = (target - main) / main. Interpret direction per metric.
- Significant timing deltas: |Δ| >= 5% AND larger than max(noise) of either side.
- Hardware: <GPU name + index from nvbench/nvidia-smi>, driver/CUDA if available.
<CPU name + cores from `lscpu`>, model, architecture, if available.
- Branches: target `<sha>` vs main `<sha>`. Axis coverage: <skim|full> (list values used).
## Summary
| Benchmark Suite | Primary metric | # Configs | # Meaningful Changes |
| ... |
## Top N Changes
| Suite / bench | axes | metric | main | target | Δ | noise, if timing |
| ... |
## Per-suite tables
(one table per benchmark, axes as columns, include all relevant metrics)
## Notes
- Exceptions excluded (same on both branches): ...
- End-of-suite segfaults ignored.
- Files generated: list of JSON/log paths + this report