proposals/csharp-10.0/constant_interpolated_strings.md
[!INCLUDESpecletdisclaimer]
Champion issue: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/2951
Enables constants to be generated from interpolated strings of type string constant.
The following code is already legal:
public class C
{
const string S1 = "Hello world";
const string S2 = "Hello" + " " + "World";
const string S3 = S1 + " Kevin, welcome to the team!";
}
However, there have been many community requests to make the following also legal:
public class C
{
const string S1 = $"Hello world";
const string S2 = $"Hello{" "}World";
const string S3 = $"{S1} Kevin, welcome to the team!";
}
This proposal represents the next logical step for constant string generation, where existing string syntax that works in other situations is made to work for constants.
The following represent the updated specifications for constant expressions under this new proposal. Current specifications from which this was directly based on can be found in §12.23.
A constant_expression is an expression that can be fully evaluated at compile-time.
constant_expression
: expression
;
A constant expression must be the null literal or a value with one of the following types: sbyte, byte, short, ushort, int, uint, long, ulong, char, float, double, decimal, bool, object, string, or any enumeration type. Only the following constructs are permitted in constant expressions:
null literal).const members of class and struct types.const parameters or local variableschecked and unchecked expressions+, -, !, and ~ unary operators.+, -, *, /, %, <<, >>, &, |, ^, &&, ||, ==, !=, <, >, <=, and >= binary operators, provided each operand is of a type listed above.?: conditional operator.${}, provided that all components are constant expressions of type string and all interpolated components lack alignment and format specifiers.The following conversions are permitted in constant expressions:
Other conversions including boxing, unboxing and implicit reference conversions of non-null values are not permitted in constant expressions. For example:
class C
{
const object i = 5; // error: boxing conversion not permitted
const object str = "hello"; // error: implicit reference conversion
}
the initialization of i is an error because a boxing conversion is required. The initialization of str is an error because an implicit reference conversion from a non-null value is required.
Whenever an expression fulfills the requirements listed above, the expression is evaluated at compile-time. This is true even if the expression is a sub-expression of a larger expression that contains non-constant constructs.
The compile-time evaluation of constant expressions uses the same rules as run-time evaluation of non-constant expressions, except that where run-time evaluation would have thrown an exception, compile-time evaluation causes a compile-time error to occur.
Unless a constant expression is explicitly placed in an unchecked context, overflows that occur in integral-type arithmetic operations and conversions during the compile-time evaluation of the expression always cause compile-time errors (§12.23).
Constant expressions occur in the contexts listed below. In these contexts, a compile-time error occurs if an expression cannot be fully evaluated at compile-time.
case labels of a switch statement (§13.8.3).goto case statements (§13.10.4).An implicit constant expression conversion (§10.2.11) permits a constant expression of type int to be converted to sbyte, byte, short, ushort, uint, or ulong, provided the value of the constant expression is within the range of the destination type.
This proposal adds additional complexity to the compiler in exchange for broader applicability of interpolated strings. As these strings are fully evaluated at compile time, the valuable automatic formatting features of interpolated strings are less neccesary. Most use cases can be largely replicated through the alternatives below.
The current + operator for string concatenation can combine strings in a similar manner to the current proposal.
What parts of the design are still undecided?
Link to design notes that affect this proposal, and describe in one sentence for each what changes they led to.