interviews/00_The_Architects_Rubric.md
How do Principal Engineers grade your system design interviews? They don't look for a single "correct" architecture โ they evaluate you across multiple axes of system maturity.
Use this rubric to self-evaluate your proposed designs. For each axis, check where your answer lands. The two columns map to the Mastery Levels: Mid-Level (L4) tests whether you can apply known concepts to diagnose a system, while Staff-Level (L6+) tests whether you can derive solutions from first principles under novel constraints.
โ Propose a new Rubric Axis (Edit in Browser)
| Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0โ2 staff signals | Solid mid-level. Focus on quantitative reasoning โ put numbers on everything. |
| 3โ4 staff signals | Strong senior. You reason about trade-offs well. Push on failure modes and cost. |
| 5โ6 staff signals | Staff-ready. You think in constraints, not features. |