Back to Claude Scientific Skills

Quality Manual Working Template

skills/iso-13485-certification/assets/templates/quality-manual-template.md

2.55.09.2 KB
Original Source

Quality Manual Working Template

STATUS: DRAFT EXAMPLE — NOT APPROVED — NO CONFORMITY OR COMPLIANCE CLAIM

This generic structure is an authoring aid. It cannot determine applicability, establish an effective QMS, support a certification claim by itself, or replace authorized management, RA/QA, legal, regulatory, notified-body, or certification- body review. Obtain ISO standards from ISO or an authorized source; do not paste copyrighted ISO text into this file.

0. Controlled-document metadata

FieldRequired entry
Document ID<assigned controlled ID>
Revision<revision>
Statusdraft / in-review / approved
Owner<accountable role>
Effective date<YYYY-MM-DD after approval>
Supersedes<document ID/revision or none>
Evidence repository<controlled location>
Confidentiality<classification>

Approval

Approval roleNamed approverDecisionDateApproval evidence ID
Authorized management<name/role>pending<YYYY-MM-DD><record ID>
RA/QA<name/role>pending<YYYY-MM-DD><record ID>
Document control<name/role>pending<YYYY-MM-DD><record ID>

Release gate: keep status draft until every required approver records a decision, open placeholders are resolved, referenced procedures exist, and training/change impacts are approved.

1. Purpose and limits

  • Intended use of this manual: <organization-specific purpose>
  • What this manual does not establish: certification, regulatory applicability, product authorization, FDA compliance, MDSAP acceptance, or EU conformity.
  • Authorized roles that own those determinations: <roles and escalation route>

2. QMS scope

Scope elementDeclared informationOwnerStatusEvidence IDApproval ID
Legal entity/entities<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Sites and addresses<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Product families<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Lifecycle activities<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Outsourced processes<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Markets considered<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>

2.1 Applicability decisions

Do not infer applicability from a checklist. Record each decision made by an authorized human.

Topic/processDecisionRationaleSource/versionDecision ownerApproval/date
<topic>applicable / not-applicable / undetermined<rationale><official source><role><record>

Undetermined is a blocking status. A not-applicable entry requires a documented, approved rationale and must not be described as an automatic exclusion.

3. Controlled source and version basis

Source IDOfficial titleEdition/version/dateAuthorized locationCurrency review dateOwnerImpact approval
<ID><title><version><location/URL><YYYY-MM-DD><role><record ID>

At minimum, distinguish the source basis used for:

  • ISO 13485 certification preparation;
  • FDA QMSR and current 21 CFR Part 820;
  • MDSAP audit preparation;
  • EU MDR or IVDR conformity assessment;
  • product- and market-specific requirements.

4. Governance, authority, and responsibilities

RoleAuthority and responsibilityIndependence/escalationDelegateCompetence evidenceApproval
Top management<entry><entry><entry><ID><ID>
Authorized management representative<entry><entry><entry><ID><ID>
RA/QA owner<entry><entry><entry><ID><ID>
Process owner<entry><entry><entry><ID><ID>
Document/record owner<entry><entry><entry><ID><ID>

5. Process architecture and interactions

Use organization-specific processes. Do not copy a standard's clauses as procedures.

ProcessInputsOutputsOwnerControlled procedureRecords/evidenceMeasuresApproval
Scope and quality planning<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Document and record control<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Risk management<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Design and development<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Supplier controls<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Production/service<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Validation and software assurance<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Identification/traceability<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Complaints, feedback, vigilance<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Nonconformity and CAPA<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Internal audit<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Management review<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Training and competence<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>
Change control<entry><entry><role><ID><IDs><measure><ID>

Attach an approved process interaction map as evidence: <record ID/location>.

6. Documentation and record controls

  • Document lifecycle and approval method: <procedure ID>
  • Record integrity, retrieval, retention, and disposition: <procedure ID>
  • External-source version monitoring: <procedure/register ID>
  • Electronic signatures/access controls: <validated control IDs>
  • Training before effective use: <procedure/evidence IDs>
  • Change-impact and linked-document updates: <procedure/evidence IDs>

7. Product lifecycle controls

For each applicable process, describe the policy-level approach and reference controlled evidence. Cover, as applicable:

  • requirements and product planning;
  • risk management through production and postmarket feedback;
  • design/development planning, reviews, transfer, and changes;
  • supplier and outsourced-process controls;
  • production, service, infrastructure, work environment, and process controls;
  • process, test-method, equipment, and software validation;
  • identification, distribution, and traceability;
  • acceptance, release, preservation, installation, and servicing.
TopicPolicy summaryOwnerProcedureEvidence setStatusApproval
<topic><organization-specific summary><role><ID><IDs>draft<ID>

8. Feedback, postmarket, and improvement controls

Document the links among feedback, complaints, reportability/vigilance decisions, risk updates, nonconformity, CAPA, change control, and management review.

LinkMethodOwnerInput evidenceOutput evidenceApproval
Complaint → reportability review<entry><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Postmarket signal → risk update<entry><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Nonconformity → CAPA decision<entry><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
CAPA → effectiveness review<entry><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Change → validation/training<entry><role><IDs><IDs><ID>

9. Assurance and oversight

ActivityScope/frequency basisIndependenceOwnerEvidenceOpen actionsApproval
Internal audit<risk-based basis><controls><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Management review<planned basis>n/a<role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Supplier monitoring<risk-based basis><controls><role><IDs><IDs><ID>
Validation review<change/risk basis><controls><role><IDs><IDs><ID>

10. Appendices

  • Controlled procedure and record index: <ID>
  • Source/version ledger: <ID>
  • Organization chart and role authorizations: <ID>
  • Process interaction map: <ID>
  • Product/site/scope register: <ID>
  • Risk-design-production-postmarket traceability matrix: <ID>
  • Open gap and change register: <ID>

Final release checklist

  • No placeholder remains.
  • Scope and applicability decisions have authorized owners and approvals.
  • Every referenced document and record exists at its controlled revision.
  • Source versions and currency-review dates are recorded.
  • Process interactions and risk/postmarket feedback links are evidenced.
  • Product-specific and jurisdiction-specific requirements were reviewed separately.
  • Training and change impacts were approved.
  • No certification, conformity, compliance, or readiness claim is made by this template.
  • Final human approvals are recorded before the effective date.