Back to Claude Scientific Skills

Document and Record Control Procedure Working Template

skills/iso-13485-certification/assets/templates/procedures/document-control-procedure-template.md

2.55.06.8 KB
Original Source

Document and Record Control Procedure Working Template

STATUS: DRAFT EXAMPLE — NOT APPROVED — NO COMPLIANCE CLAIM

This structure is not a released procedure. It does not determine retention, regulatory applicability, conformity, or certification. Authorized management, RA/QA, legal/regulatory, process owners, and document control must approve the organization-specific controls. ISO publications are copyrighted; use an authorized copy and do not paste their text here.

Controlled-document metadata

FieldEntry
Document ID/revision<ID> / <revision>
Owner<accountable role>
Statusdraft / in-review / approved
Effective date<YYYY-MM-DD after approval>
Evidence repository<controlled location>
Change/superseded record<IDs>
Approval roleNamed approverStatusDateApproval evidence
Process owner<name/role>pending<date><ID>
RA/QA<name/role>pending<date><ID>
System owner<name/role>pending<date><ID>

1. Purpose, scope, and interfaces

  • Controlled documents covered: <types, systems, sites, products>
  • Records covered: <types, systems, sites, products>
  • External sources covered: standards, regulations, guidance, customer and supplier specifications, and product-specific sources.
  • Interfaces: change control, training, validation, data integrity, cybersecurity, supplier controls, product files, complaints/CAPA, audit, and management review.

2. Roles and segregation of duties

RoleAuthority/responsibilityIndependence or access restrictionDelegateEvidenceApproval
Document owner<entry><entry><role><ID><ID>
Record owner<entry><entry><role><ID><ID>
Reviewer<entry><entry><role><ID><ID>
Approver<entry><entry><role><ID><ID>
System administrator<entry><entry><role><ID><ID>

3. Document lifecycle

StageRequired controlsOwnerStatusEvidenceApproval
Request/authoringneed, scope, source/version, author<role>draft<ID><ID>
Reviewtechnical, process, RA/QA, linked-document impact<role>draft<ID><ID>
Approval/releasenamed authority, date, revision, effective date<role>draft<ID><ID>
Distribution/useaccess, point-of-use revision, copy status<role>draft<ID><ID>
Changerationale, impact, validation/training, linked updates<role>draft<ID><ID>
Obsolescencewithdrawal, archive, retained-copy identification<role>draft<ID><ID>

Define approved rules for identifiers, revision schemes, emergency changes, printed copies, translations, electronic signatures, and controlled exports. Do not assume that a downloaded or printed file remains controlled.

4. Record lifecycle and data integrity

ControlOrganization-specific methodOwnerStatusEvidenceApproval
Creation/attribution<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Legibility/completeness<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Contemporaneous entry<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Corrections/audit trail<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Access/security<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Backup/recovery<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Retrieval<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>
Retention/disposition<entry><role>draft<ID><ID>

Retention periods must cite an approved basis for each record type. This template does not supply a universal period.

5. External source and version control

Source IDPublisher/titleVersion/dateAuthorized locationApplicability ownerLast currency reviewImpact recordStatusApproval
<ID><entry><entry><entry><role><date><ID>review-due<ID>

Required controls:

  1. Obtain standards from an authorized source and preserve license restrictions.
  2. Record the exact edition/version incorporated into each jurisdictional basis.
  3. Monitor official publishers; do not rely on search snippets as controlled text.
  4. Perform and approve impact assessment before changing QMS documents.
  5. Distinguish ISO, FDA QMSR/eCFR, MDSAP, EU MDR/IVDR/MDCG, and product-specific sources rather than treating them as interchangeable.

6. Electronic systems and software validation

System/useIntended useRisk basisAccess/audit-trail controlsValidation evidenceChange/revalidation triggerOwnerApproval
``<entry><entry><entry><ID><entry><role><ID>

Do not release an electronic workflow until authorized owners approve intended use, validation evidence, access roles, data migration, backup/recovery, and change controls.

7. Change and training impact

Every change record should include:

  • reason, affected products/sites/processes/documents/records;
  • source/version and regulatory-impact review;
  • risk, validation, software, supplier, and postmarket impacts;
  • training population and completion evidence before effective use;
  • implementation verification, owner, status, evidence, and approval.

8. Registers and audit evidence

RegisterOwnerStatusLocationReview frequency/basisEvidenceApproval
Master document list<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>
Record retention schedule<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>
External source ledger<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>
Access/role register<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>
Training/change register<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>
Obsolete/disposition log<role>draft<location><basis><ID><ID>

Release checklist

  • Scope includes documents, records, external sources, and electronic systems.
  • Owners, statuses, evidence, source versions, and approvals are explicit.
  • Access, integrity, retrieval, retention, disposition, and audit trails are defined.
  • Change, validation, software, supplier, and training impacts are linked.
  • No universal retention period or automatic applicability conclusion is asserted.
  • No template or script result is described as compliance or certification.
  • Required human approvals are complete before the effective date.