Back to Claude Scientific Skills

Safety and Scope

skills/clinical-decision-support/references/safety_and_scope.md

2.55.04.5 KB
Original Source

Safety and Scope

Intended Use

Use this skill only to create or check research, evaluation, documentation, and governance artifacts from synthetic or aggregate data.

Acceptable examples:

  • an intended-use statement for a retrospective model evaluation;
  • an aggregate subgroup performance report;
  • a statistical analysis plan;
  • a GRADE evidence-profile shell for a human panel;
  • a release-gate traceability matrix;
  • a de-identification process checklist.

Prohibited Use

Do not:

  • accept or produce a record about a person;
  • infer a diagnosis, prognosis, phenotype, biomarker class, or eligibility for a person;
  • recommend or compare care options for a person;
  • provide medication, dose, schedule, monitoring, or contraindication instructions;
  • triage, assign urgency, create an alarm, or suggest escalation;
  • deploy logic in an EHR, bedside tool, portal, order set, or alerting workflow;
  • represent output as clinical advice, a validated medical device, or an authorized clinical system;
  • claim legal, regulatory, quality-system, or HIPAA compliance.

No disclaimer makes an otherwise prohibited workflow acceptable.

Stop Conditions

Stop and do not process the input when any of the following is present:

  • names, record numbers, contact details, precise locations, or person-linked dates;
  • row-level records, timelines, notes, images, signals, or sequences;
  • a request about “this patient,” “this result,” or an individual case;
  • instructions to choose a therapy, test, dose, disposition, or urgency;
  • instructions to push output to a live clinical system;
  • an assertion that passing a checklist proves authorization or compliance.

Explain the boundary briefly. For care, direct the requester to a licensed healthcare professional and locally validated, appropriately authorized systems. For privacy, regulatory, or legal determinations, direct them to qualified organizational reviewers.

Required Intended-Use Elements

An artifact is incomplete unless it states:

  1. Purpose — the specific research or governance question.
  2. Users — named roles, not “clinicians” broadly.
  3. Population scope — aggregate cohort or synthetic data only.
  4. Decision role — descriptive, evaluative, or governance support.
  5. Excluded uses — every prohibited use above.
  6. Data level — aggregate or synthetic, with no PHI/raw rows supplied.
  7. Limitations — known gaps, assumptions, transportability, and failure modes.
  8. Human review — required roles and approval status.
  9. Versioning — owner, version, release date, changes, and retirement criteria.
  10. Monitoring — drift, calibration, subgroup performance, incidents, and review cadence when applicable.

Human Review Matrix

ArtifactMinimum review roles
Evidence profilesystematic-review methodologist; domain experts; panel chair
Cohort reportstatistician/epidemiologist; data steward; domain expert
Survival planstatistician with time-to-event expertise; domain expert
Model/biomarker evaluationprediction-model methodologist; assay/domain expert; fairness reviewer
Privacy checklistprivacy official or qualified de-identification expert
Logic traceabilitysystem owner; independent validator; governance approver
Regulatory contextqualified legal/regulatory counsel

Review completion must be recorded by the responsible organization. The scripts do not authenticate reviewers or approvals.

Safe Language

Prefer:

  • “The aggregate evaluation estimated…”
  • “Performance differed across evaluated subgroups; causes and practical importance require review.”
  • “The evidence panel judged certainty as…; rationale and sources are recorded.”
  • “This checklist is complete; it is not a compliance determination.”
  • “External validation has not been performed.”

Avoid:

  • “The model is safe/fair/clinically valid.”
  • “This biomarker means the patient should…”
  • “The tool is FDA compliant/approved.”
  • “The dataset is HIPAA compliant.”
  • “The recommendation is Grade 1A” without the framework, panel process, outcome-specific judgments, and source trail.

Audit Trail

Record:

  • immutable artifact ID and version;
  • source versions and access dates;
  • data provenance and cut date;
  • code version and command;
  • declared thresholds before analysis;
  • reviewer roles, dates, decisions, and unresolved objections;
  • change reason, validation evidence, rollback plan, and retirement decision.

Do not put secrets, credentials, or patient information in audit logs.