scientific-skills/what-if-oracle/references/scenario-templates.md
Reference guide for domain-specific scenario analysis configurations.
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: Likely Case + Contrarian + Second Order Key tension: Speed vs. thoroughness — startups can't afford to analyze forever
Template prompt:
"What if we [specific action] in [timeframe]? Our current state: [revenue, team size, runway]. Key constraint: [the limiting factor]."
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: Worst Case + Wild Card + Second Order Key tension: Engineering elegance vs. shipping speed
Template prompt:
"What if we choose [technology/approach] for [system]? Current architecture: [brief description]. Team capability: [relevant skills]. Timeline: [deadline]."
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: All 6 branches — money decisions deserve full analysis Key tension: Risk tolerance vs. opportunity cost
Template prompt:
"What if [market condition / financial event] happens? Our exposure: [amount/percentage]. Current position: [financial state]. Time horizon: [investment period]."
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: Likely Case + Best Case + Contrarian Key tension: Security vs. growth — comfort zone vs. expansion
Template prompt:
"What if I [personal decision]? My current situation: [brief]. What I value most: [1-3 values]. What I'm afraid of: [honest answer]."
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: Wild Card + Second Order + Contrarian Key tension: Local impact vs. systemic effects
Template prompt:
"What if [geopolitical event] happens? My exposure: [how it affects me/my organization]. Time horizon: [relevant period]."
Variables to test:
Branch emphasis: Worst Case (detailed) + Likely Case + Second Order Key tension: Immediate triage vs. root cause resolution
Template prompt:
"We're facing [crisis/incident]. Current impact: [what's broken]. Stakeholders affected: [who]. Resources available: [what we can deploy]. What if [specific escalation scenario]?"
For complex, multi-layered analysis:
ROUND 1: "What if X?"
→ Identify the most likely branch (α)
ROUND 2: "Given α is happening, what if Y?"
→ Identify the most likely sub-branch
ROUND 3: "Given α+Y, what if Z?"
→ Map the deepest consequences
Each round narrows the possibility space while deepening understanding.
Maximum recommended depth: 3 rounds.
When assigning probabilities to branches:
| Confidence Level | Probability Range | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Very High | >80% | Strong historical precedent + current data alignment |
| High | 60-80% | Multiple converging signals, some historical support |
| Medium | 30-60% | Mixed signals, could go either way |
| Low | 10-30% | Plausible but requires several things to go a specific way |
| Very Low | <10% | Black swan territory — possible but unlikely |
Rule: All branch probabilities in a single analysis should sum to approximately 100%. If they don't, there's a missing branch.