scientific-skills/clinical-reports/references/data_presentation.md
General guidelines:
Title placement:
Footnote symbols (in order):
Purpose: Describe study population at baseline
Standard format:
Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
Characteristic Treatment Group Control Group Total
(N=150) (N=145) (N=295)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Age, years
Mean (SD) 64.2 (8.5) 63.8 (9.1) 64.0 (8.8)
Median (IQR) 65 (58-71) 64 (57-70) 64 (58-71)
Range 45-82 43-85 43-85
Sex, n (%)
Male 95 (63.3) 88 (60.7) 183 (62.0)
Female 55 (36.7) 57 (39.3) 112 (38.0)
Race, n (%)
White 110 (73.3) 105 (72.4) 215 (72.9)
Black/African American 25 (16.7) 28 (19.3) 53 (18.0)
Asian 10 (6.7) 8 (5.5) 18 (6.1)
Other 5 (3.3) 4 (2.8) 9 (3.0)
BMI, kg/m²
Mean (SD) 28.5 (4.2) 28.1 (4.5) 28.3 (4.4)
Baseline HbA1c, %
Mean (SD) 8.9 (1.2) 9.0 (1.3) 9.0 (1.2)
Disease duration, years
Median (IQR) 6 (3-10) 5 (3-9) 6 (3-10)
Prior medications, n (%)
Metformin 135 (90.0) 130 (89.7) 265 (89.8)
Sulfonylurea 45 (30.0) 42 (29.0) 87 (29.5)
Insulin 20 (13.3) 18 (12.4) 38 (12.9)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
SD = standard deviation; IQR = interquartile range; BMI = body mass index;
HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c
Key elements:
Purpose: Present primary and secondary endpoint results
Example:
Table 2. Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoints at Week 24
Endpoint Treatment Control Difference P-value
(N=150) (N=145) (95% CI)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Primary Endpoint
Change in HbA1c from baseline, %
Mean (SE) -1.8 (0.1) -0.6 (0.1) -1.2 <0.001
95% CI (-2.0, -1.6) (-0.8, -0.4) (-1.5, -0.9)
Secondary Endpoints
Change in FPG, mg/dL
Mean (SE) -42.5 (3.2) -15.2 (3.4) -27.3 <0.001
95% CI (-48.8, -36.2) (-21.9, -8.5) (-36.4, -18.2)
% achieving HbA1c <7%
n (%) 78 (52.0) 25 (17.2) - <0.001
95% CI (43.9, 60.1) (11.4, 24.5)
Change in body weight, kg
Mean (SE) -3.2 (0.4) -0.5 (0.4) -2.7 <0.001
95% CI (-4.0, -2.4) (-1.3, 0.3) (-3.8, -1.6)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c;
FPG = fasting plasma glucose
Statistical presentation:
Purpose: Summarize safety data
Example:
Table 3. Summary of Adverse Events
Event Category Treatment Control P-value
(N=150) (N=145)
n (%) n (%)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Any adverse event 120 (80.0) 95 (65.5) 0.004
Treatment-related adverse events 85 (56.7) 42 (29.0) <0.001
Serious adverse events 12 (8.0) 8 (5.5) 0.412
Adverse events leading to 8 (5.3) 4 (2.8) 0.257
discontinuation
Deaths 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7) 0.492
Common adverse events (≥5% in any group)
Nausea 45 (30.0) 12 (8.3) <0.001
Diarrhea 38 (25.3) 10 (6.9) <0.001
Headache 22 (14.7) 18 (12.4) 0.568
Hypoglycemia 18 (12.0) 5 (3.4) 0.007
Dizziness 12 (8.0) 8 (5.5) 0.412
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Adverse events coded using MedDRA version 24.0
Key elements:
Shift tables showing changes from baseline:
Table 4. Laboratory Values Meeting Predefined Criteria for Abnormality
Laboratory Parameter Treatment Control
(N=150) (N=145)
n (%) n (%)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
ALT >3× ULN 8 (5.3) 3 (2.1)
AST >3× ULN 5 (3.3) 2 (1.4)
Total bilirubin >2× ULN 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7)
Creatinine >1.5× baseline 12 (8.0) 5 (3.4)
Hemoglobin <10 g/dL 3 (2.0) 2 (1.4)
Platelets <100 × 10³/μL 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
ULN = upper limit of normal; ALT = alanine aminotransferase;
AST = aspartate aminotransferase
Table 5. Patient Disposition
Disposition Treatment Control Total
(N=150) (N=145) (N=295)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Screened - - 425
Randomized 150 145 295
Completed study 135 (90.0) 130 (89.7) 265 (89.8)
Discontinued, n (%) 15 (10.0) 15 (10.3) 30 (10.2)
Adverse event 8 (5.3) 4 (2.8) 12 (4.1)
Lack of efficacy 2 (1.3) 5 (3.4) 7 (2.4)
Lost to follow-up 3 (2.0) 4 (2.8) 7 (2.4)
Withdrawal of consent 2 (1.3) 2 (1.4) 4 (1.4)
Included in efficacy analysis
ITT population 150 (100) 145 (100) 295 (100)
Per-protocol population 142 (94.7) 138 (95.2) 280 (94.9)
Included in safety analysis 150 (100) 145 (100) 295 (100)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
ITT = intent-to-treat
General guidelines:
Figure caption:
Purpose: Show patient flow through randomized trial
Assessed for eligibility (n=425)
│
┌─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┐
│ │
Excluded (n=130) │
• Not meeting inclusion criteria (n=85) │
• Declined to participate (n=32) │
• Other reasons (n=13) │
│
Randomized (n=295)
│
┌───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┐
│ │
Allocated to Treatment (n=150) Allocated to Control (n=145)
• Received allocated intervention (n=148) • Received allocated intervention (n=143)
• Did not receive allocated intervention (n=2) • Did not receive allocated intervention (n=2)
Reasons: withdrew consent before treatment Reasons: withdrew consent before treatment
│ │
┌───────────┴────────────┐ ┌──────────────┴─────────────┐
│ │ │ │
Lost to follow-up (n=3) Discontinued (n=12) Lost to follow-up (n=4) Discontinued (n=11)
• Adverse events (n=8) • Adverse events (n=4)
• Lack of efficacy (n=2) • Lack of efficacy (n=5)
• Withdrew consent (n=2) • Withdrew consent (n=2)
│ │
Analyzed (n=150) Analyzed (n=145)
• ITT analysis (n=150) • ITT analysis (n=145)
• Per-protocol analysis (n=142) • Per-protocol analysis (n=138)
• Excluded from analysis (n=0) • Excluded from analysis (n=0)
Purpose: Show time-to-event data
Elements:
Caption example:
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in the treatment and control groups.
Tick marks indicate censored observations. Number at risk shown below graph.
Log-rank p<0.001. Median survival: Treatment 24.5 months (95% CI: 22.1-26.8),
Control 18.2 months (95% CI: 16.5-20.1). Hazard ratio 0.68 (95% CI: 0.55-0.84).
Purpose: Display subgroup analyses or meta-analysis results
Elements:
Caption example:
Figure 2. Forest Plot of Treatment Effect by Subgroup
Effect of treatment vs. control on primary endpoint across pre-specified subgroups.
Squares represent point estimates; horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals.
Square size is proportional to subgroup sample size. Overall effect shown as diamond.
p-value for interaction testing heterogeneity of treatment effect across subgroups.
Purpose: Show distribution of continuous variable
Elements:
Purpose: Show relationship between two continuous variables
Elements:
Purpose: Show individual trajectories over time
Elements:
Purpose: Compare proportions or means across groups
Elements:
Avoid:
Purpose: Show changes over time
Elements:
Purpose: Show distribution of continuous variable
Elements:
Numerator and denominator:
Percentages:
Confidence intervals for proportions:
Measures of central tendency:
Measures of dispersion:
When to use each:
Reporting guidelines:
Avoid:
Options:
Reporting:
Interpretation:
Indicate clearly:
General rules:
Statistical software:
General graphics software:
Color-blind friendly palettes:
Recommended palettes:
Resolution:
File formats:
Image editing:
This reference provides comprehensive guidance for presenting clinical data in tables and figures following best practices and publication standards. Use these guidelines to create clear, accurate, and professional data presentations.