BTCPayServer Pull Request Descriptions

Write pull request descriptions for the people who need to understand the change, not for people who can already read the diff.

Audience

Assume most readers are non-technical users, merchants, admins, support people, translators, or reviewers trying to understand the product impact.
Use technical details only when the pull request is itself technical and the details are necessary to review or explain the change.
Avoid implementation jargon such as controller, view model, migration, refactor, endpoint, dependency injection, database schema, or renamed class unless that is the actual user-facing concern.

Explain what changed in terms of user-visible behavior, workflows, screens, settings, permissions, API behavior, or operational impact.
Describe why the change matters when it is not obvious from the title.
Include the practical before-and-after effect when relevant.
Mention limitations, compatibility concerns, or follow-up work if users or operators should know about them.
Do not repeat a file-by-file or commit-by-commit summary that reviewers can already see in the diff.
Do not describe purely internal implementation choices unless they affect how someone uses, deploys, reviews, or tests BTCPay Server.

Prefer screenshots for visual changes.
Prefer a short video or GIF for flows, animations, checkout behavior, Point of Sale behavior, or changes that require several steps to understand.
Include visuals for UI changes unless the change is too small, invisible, or impractical to capture.
If visuals are omitted for a visual change, briefly explain why.

Start with a short paragraph explaining the functional change in plain language.
Add screenshots or a short video when applicable.
Add a concise testing note that describes the user flow or scenario checked, not just the command that was run.
Add technical notes only when they are necessary for reviewers, operators, integrators, or plugin authors.