Back to Agno

Test Log: cookbook/00_quickstart

cookbook/00_quickstart/TEST_LOG.md

2.8.213.0 KB
Original Source

Test Log: cookbook/00_quickstart

Latest Verification — 2026-07-23

Environment: .venvs/quickstart/bin/python (Python 3.12.8)

Agno: 2.8.0 from the regenerated quickstart lock

Base Commit: 1e03b4ef3 plus the uncommitted quickstart overhaul

Model: gemini-3.6-flash

Google SDK: google-genai==2.14.0

Pre-flight: Cookbook pattern checker passed 13 runnable files with zero violations. Ruff format/check, compileall, and git diff --check passed. Live tests used separate state under tmp/quickstart/.


agent_with_tools.py

Status: PASS

Description: First-agent path with a least-privilege Yahoo Finance toolkit.

Result: Gemini called the 4 enabled tools needed for the brief and returned a concise, timestamped market summary. No disabled YFinance tools were exposed.


agent_with_structured_output.py

Status: PASS

Description: Typed StockAnalysis output with optional unavailable market fields, numeric bounds, and a Literal recommendation.

Result: The run returned a valid StockAnalysis. Optional values, non-negative price constraints, ticker format, and the closed recommendation set all validated.


agent_with_typed_input_output.py

Status: PASS

Description: End-to-end input and output validation.

Result: Dict and Pydantic inputs both returned typed output. A malformed JSON string and invalid ticker (!!!) were rejected before a model call.


agent_with_storage.py

Status: PASS

Description: Fixed-session conversation continuity in an isolated SQLite database.

Result: Three turns shared prior context. A new Python process restored the same session and found 8 stored chat messages.


agent_with_memory.py

Status: PASS

Description: User-level memory for interests and risk tolerance across distinct sessions.

Result: Gemini stored two durable memories (AI/semiconductor interest and moderate risk tolerance). A different explicit session started with zero chat history, retrieved both memories, and used them to tailor its response.


agent_with_state_management.py

Status: PASS

Description: Tool-managed watchlist state with a stable session ID.

Result: The tools added NVDA, AAPL, and GOOGL; the price tool ran for all three. A separate Python process restored {"watchlist": ["NVDA", "AAPL", "GOOGL"]} from SQLite.


agent_search_over_knowledge.py

Status: PASS

Description: Hybrid search over the versioned local Agno overview.

Result: The file indexed successfully, the agent called search_knowledge_base, and the answer stayed within the retrieved source, including the current Gemini 3.6 example.


agent_with_learning.py

Status: PASS

Description: Canonical LearningMachine learned knowledge across users.

Result: The teaching run saved the rule separating cyclical inventory changes from structural demand. A different user triggered search_learnings and applied that rule in an NVDA/AMD comparison.


agent_with_guardrails.py

Status: PASS

Description: Built-in PII and injection checks plus a custom spam guardrail.

Result: Normal input completed. PII, prompt injection, and spam each returned RunStatus.error and printed [BLOCKED]; no blocked request was mislabeled [OK].


human_in_the_loop.py

Status: PASS

Description: Confirmation gate around a simulated publish action.

Result: The run paused with one pending publish_research_brief call. Approval executed the tool and reported publication. A separate rejection run explicitly reported that publication was not finalized.


multi_agent_team.py

Status: PASS

Description: Bull and bear analysts coordinated by a team leader.

Result: Both members ran, the leader surfaced their disagreement and synthesized the evidence, and the follow-up comparison reused team context.


sequential_workflow.py

Status: PASS

Description: Explicit Data Gathering → Analysis → Report Writing pipeline.

Result: All three steps completed in order. The analyst flagged missing comparison data, and the writer produced a concise research outlook. End-to-end runtime was approximately 30 seconds.


AgentOS

Status: PASS

Description: Full quickstart registry and live HTTP server.

Result: Uvicorn started cleanly. /health returned 200 with status ok; /config returned 10 agents, 1 team, and 1 workflow. All 12 quick-prompt IDs resolved to registered components. Stable database IDs eliminated registry shadowing warnings.


Latest Summary

#FileStatus
01agent_with_tools.pyPASS
02agent_with_structured_output.pyPASS
03agent_with_typed_input_output.pyPASS
04agent_with_storage.pyPASS
05agent_with_memory.pyPASS
06agent_with_state_management.pyPASS
07agent_search_over_knowledge.pyPASS
08agent_with_learning.pyPASS
09agent_with_guardrails.pyPASS
10human_in_the_loop.pyPASS
11multi_agent_team.pyPASS
12sequential_workflow.pyPASS
run.py / AgentOSPASS

Result: 12/12 cookbooks PASS; AgentOS PASS


Historical Verification — 2026-05-19

Date: 2026-05-19 Environment: .venvs/quickstart/bin/python (Python 3.12.8) Model: gemini-3.5-flash Pre-flight: All .py files pass py_compile; GOOGLE_API_KEY loaded via .envrc. 01-03 run serially; 04-12 run in parallel (10 serialized after 08 due to shared learnings Chroma collection).


agent_with_tools.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent uses YFinanceTools to fetch real-time data for NVIDIA. Tool calling, data retrieval, and brief formatting all work correctly.

Result: 5 tool calls (get_current_stock_price, get_stock_fundamentals, get_company_info, get_company_news, get_historical_stock_prices). Delivered a markdown investment brief: NVDA at $220.61, market cap $5.34T, P/E 45.11. Response in 17.4s.


agent_with_structured_output.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent returns a typed StockAnalysis Pydantic model with all required fields populated.

Result: Valid StockAnalysis for NVIDIA: price $220.61, market cap "5.34T", P/E 45.11, 52-week range $129.16-$236.54, recommendation "Strong Buy". All fields populated and printed programmatically without errors. 9.3s.


agent_with_typed_input_output.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent accepts typed AnalysisRequest input (dict and Pydantic model) and returns typed StockAnalysis. Tests deep analysis with risks (NVDA) and quick analysis without risks (AAPL).

Result: Both input modes work. NVDA deep returned populated key_drivers and key_risks. AAPL quick (price $298.97, recommendation "Buy") returned null for both optional fields as expected by analysis_type="quick" and include_risks=False.


agent_with_storage.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent persists conversation across 3 sequential turns using SQLite + a fixed session_id="finance-agent-session".

Result: All 3 turns completed. Agent correctly referenced NVIDIA from turn 1 when comparing to Tesla in turn 2, and synthesized both analyses into a final recommendation in turn 3. Session persistence works.

Note: A first attempt at this test hung at 0% CPU for several minutes (before any output). Killing and re-running cleanly resolved it; root cause not investigated. If it recurs, look at SQLite locking from leftover state in tmp/agents.db.


agent_with_memory.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent uses MemoryManager with enable_agentic_memory=True to capture user preferences. First prompt sets preferences (AI/semiconductor stocks, moderate risk), second asks for personalized recommendations.

Result: Agent stored a single consolidated memory: "User is interested in AI and semiconductor stocks and has a moderate risk tolerance." (topics: investment_interests, risk_tolerance, finance). Second prompt used the stored memory to tailor recommendations. get_user_memories(user_id="[email protected]") returned the memory correctly.

Note: The previous 2026-02-20 run on gemini-3-flash-preview produced 2 separate memory records; gemini-3.5-flash chose to consolidate into 1. Both are valid behavior for the cookbook.


agent_with_state_management.py

Status: PASS

Description: Agent manages a stock watchlist via session_state. Custom tools (add_to_watchlist, remove_from_watchlist) modify session_state["watchlist"]; state injected into instructions via {watchlist}.

Result: Agent added NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL via parallel tool calls. Second prompt fetched current prices for all 3. Final get_session_state() returned ['NVDA', 'AAPL', 'GOOGL'].


agent_search_over_knowledge.py

Status: PASS

Description: Loads https://docs.agno.com/ into ChromaDb (hybrid search, RRF), then answers "What is Agno?" by searching the knowledge base.

Result: Knowledge load succeeded against the updated URL. Agent searched the knowledge base and returned a comprehensive answer covering Agno's SDK code example, AgentOS production APIs, control plane UI, and data-ownership story.

Note: Original URL https://docs.agno.com/introduction.md was failing with httpx.HTTPStatusError: 307 Temporary Redirect to a broken target (/.md). Switched to https://docs.agno.com/ in this run.


custom_tool_for_self_learning.py

Status: PASS

Description: Custom save_learning tool persists insights to a ChromaDb knowledge base. Three turns: ask about P/E ratios, approve learning, query saved learnings.

Result: Agent proposed and saved "Tech Stock P/E Benchmarks" (covers mature mega-caps 20-35x, high-growth SaaS 35-60x+, semiconductors 15-25x, PEG cross-reference). On the third prompt the agent successfully retrieved and presented the saved learning from the knowledge base.


agent_with_guardrails.py

Status: PASS

Description: Three guardrails — PIIDetectionGuardrail, PromptInjectionGuardrail, custom SpamDetectionGuardrail. Four test cases.

Result: All 4 cases behaved correctly:

  • Normal ("P/E ratio for tech stocks?"): processed successfully with full response
  • PII ("My SSN is 123-45-6789"): blocked with CheckTrigger.PII_DETECTED
  • Injection ("Ignore previous instructions"): blocked with CheckTrigger.PROMPT_INJECTION
  • Spam ("URGENT!!! BUY NOW!!!!"): blocked with CheckTrigger.INPUT_NOT_ALLOWED

Note: Same pre-existing quirk as the 2026-02-20 run — guardrail blocks are surfaced as ERROR logs by print_response rather than raising InputCheckError to the caller, so the demo's except InputCheckError branch is cosmetic. The guardrails themselves function correctly.


human_in_the_loop.py

Status: PASS

Description: @tool(requires_confirmation=True) on save_learning. Flow pauses for confirmation, accepts "y" from stdin, resumes with agent.continue_run().

Result: Agent paused on save_learning call, displayed confirmation prompt with tool name and args, accepted "y", executed the tool, and saved "Tech Stock P/E Ratio Benchmarks" to the knowledge base. Final response included a polished markdown explanation with PEG-ratio formula. continue_run flow works.


multi_agent_team.py

Status: PASS

Description: Team of 3 agents — Bull Analyst, Bear Analyst, Lead Analyst (team leader). Two prompts: analyze NVDA, then compare to AMD.

Result: Both prompts completed. For NVDA: bull and bear agents independently fetched data and produced opposing arguments; leader synthesized into a balanced recommendation. For the AMD comparison: leader delegated to both analysts, produced a comprehensive comparison with bull case, bear case, synthesis, recommendation ("UNDERWEIGHT / SELL relative to NVDA, Confidence 8.5/10"), and key metrics table. Total run time ~97s.


sequential_workflow.py

Status: PASS

Description: Three-step workflow pipeline — Data Gatherer → Analyst → Report Writer.

Result: All 3 steps completed in sequence. Data Gatherer fetched NVDA market data. Analyst interpreted P/E, P/S, strengths, weaknesses, and benchmark comparisons. Report Writer produced a concise brief with metric table covering price/market cap ($220.61 / $5.34T), Forward P/E and PEG (18.98 / 0.71), margins (71.07% / 55.60%), net cash ($51.15B), ROE (101.49%). Total workflow time: 39.2s.


Historical Summary

#FileStatus
01agent_with_tools.pyPASS
02agent_with_structured_output.pyPASS
03agent_with_typed_input_output.pyPASS
04agent_with_storage.pyPASS
05agent_with_memory.pyPASS
06agent_with_state_management.pyPASS
07agent_search_over_knowledge.pyPASS
08custom_tool_for_self_learning.pyPASS
09agent_with_guardrails.pyPASS
10human_in_the_loop.pyPASS
11multi_agent_team.pyPASS
12sequential_workflow.pyPASS

Result: 12/12 PASS